2022
DOI: 10.3390/min12070872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Re-Visiting the Quantification of Hematite by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy

Abstract: Hematite concentration is an important climatic proxy for environmental (climatic) studies of soils and sediments. However, the accurate quantification of naturally occurring hematite has always been a difficult question, especially for those areas with lower hematite concentrations. Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) is an effective method for hematite identification and quantification with lower detection limits. In this study, we synthesized a set of samples with well-determined concentrations to explor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ∆R spectra of the untreated samples showed the presence of Fe(III) as goethite in the RBS and AQS samples (peaks at 420 and 500 nm), whereas the finer-grained SLT and CLY samples did not contain any discernible peaks due to the relatively low proportions of Fe(III). However, following thermal treatment, the presence of hematite (~560 nm) was observed in the ∆R spectra of all samples (Figure 2c,d) [65,84,85]. Interestingly, the hematite peak in the sand samples was located at 560 nm whereas the hematite peak in the thermally treated SLT and CLY samples was shifted down to 550 nm and exhibited a lower reflectance value despite higher initial bulk Fe concentrations.…”
Section: Fe Mineralogy and Transformations From Thermal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ∆R spectra of the untreated samples showed the presence of Fe(III) as goethite in the RBS and AQS samples (peaks at 420 and 500 nm), whereas the finer-grained SLT and CLY samples did not contain any discernible peaks due to the relatively low proportions of Fe(III). However, following thermal treatment, the presence of hematite (~560 nm) was observed in the ∆R spectra of all samples (Figure 2c,d) [65,84,85]. Interestingly, the hematite peak in the sand samples was located at 560 nm whereas the hematite peak in the thermally treated SLT and CLY samples was shifted down to 550 nm and exhibited a lower reflectance value despite higher initial bulk Fe concentrations.…”
Section: Fe Mineralogy and Transformations From Thermal Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The ∆R, or first-transform derivative of the reflectance, is highly reproducible and provides indicative information on Fe-oxide mineralogy. For example, Horneman et al [65] found that the ∆R at 520 nm is negatively correlated to the Fe(II)/Fe(Total) content in the sediment and can be used as a proxy for Fe(III); other authors noted that the ∆R spectra are sensitive indicators for hematite and goethite with peaks occurring between 555 and 575 for hematite and two peaks between 420-430 and 480 to 530 for goethite [82][83][84][85]. The ∆R spectra of the untreated and thermally treated sediment samples show contrasting results (Figure 2c,d).…”
Section: Diffuse Reflectance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) can detect minerals in a fast, non‐destructive, economic, and eco‐friendly way (Cao et al., 2022; Coblinski et al., 2021; Gras et al., 2014; Stenberg et al., 2010). It has been widely used for iron oxide quantification (e.g., hematite and goethite) (Balsam et al., 2014; Barrón & Torrent, 1986; Jiang et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2011; Scheinost et al., 1998; Torrent & Barrón, 2003), and is potential to be an alternate technique for the analysis of sedimentary samples in large quantities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) The first derivatives of diffuse reflectance spectral curves have been used to semi-quantitatively determine the amount of hematite in soil [15]. (ii) The application of the second-derivative curve of the Kubelka-Munk (K-M) remission functions has greatly reduced the detection limit of hematite [16]. Thus, DRS is superior to other methods such as Raman spectra and X-ray diffraction for quantifying hematite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%