Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines

Abstract

IntroductionPatient and public involvement (PPI) is inconsistently reported in health and social care research. Improving the quality of how PPI is reported is critical in developing a higher quality evidence base to gain a better insight into the methods and impact of PPI. This paper describes the methods used to develop and gain consensus on guidelines for reporting PPI in research studies (updated version of the Guidance for Reporting Patient and Public Involvement (GRIPP2)).MethodsThere were three key stages in the development of GRIPP2: identification of key items for the guideline from systematic review evidence of the impact of PPI on health research and health services, a three-phase online Delphi survey with a diverse sample of experts in PPI to gain consensus on included items and a face-to-face consensus meeting to finalise and reach definitive agreement on GRIPP2. Challenges and lessons learnt during the development of the reporting guidelines are reported.DiscussionThe process of reaching consensus is vital within the development of guidelines and policy directions, although debate around how best to reach consensus is still needed. This paper discusses the critical stages of consensus development as applied to the development of consensus for GRIPP2 and discusses the benefits and challenges of consensus development.

Prevalence and comorbidity of autism spectrum disorder in Spain: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

“…One of the study protocol co-authors (AT) is the parent of a child with ASD and a member of a patient group (APRENEM Association for the Inclusion of People with ASD, Barcelona, Spain). We will evaluate whether the epidemiological studies included in the systematic review had any patient and/or public involvement [53, 54].…”

Prevalence and comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Spain: study protocol for extending a systematic review with updated meta-analysis of observational studies

“…We will evaluate whether the epidemiological studies included in the systematic review had any patient and public involvement [53, 54].…”

Envisioning Insight-Driven Learning Based on Thick Data Analytics With Focus on Healthcare

“…The iterative nature of the Delphi process avoids some of the pitfalls of other IDL methods, such as the effects of dominant persons or the tendency to conform to a particular viewpoint [7]. Despite this promising support, Delphi process suffers from the following weaknesses [8]:  Does not take into account widely differing opinions or large changes in public opinions (paradigm shifts [9])  The initiator's point of view may dominate in the analysis  Time-consuming  Requires high participant motivation  The quality of the participants affects the outcomes There are more problems and concerns associated with the conceptualization and meaningful assessment and measurement of all the current IDL methods, have also been identified [10]. Each of these concerns and weaknesses points to different directions for methodological research on IDL that involve patient and public involvement with high engaging degree and empowering learning to have an impact [11].…”