2020
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reaction Kinetics Analysis of Ethanol Dehydrogenation Catalyzed by MgO–SiO2

Abstract: The Mg-catalyzed dehydrogenation of ethanol to yield acetaldehyde is an important step in the Lebedev reaction. In this work, we prepared a model MgO−SiO 2 catalyst by impregnation of MgO onto an SBA-15 support and used this material to study the reaction kinetics of ethanol dehydrogenation to acetaldehyde. The rates of acetaldehyde and ethylene production were measured for ethanol partial pressures ranging from 0.92 to 5.25 kPa. Both rates are fractional order at 723 K, decreasing to nearly zero-order at 648 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(172 reference statements)
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our DFT calculations, most energy demanding process in the ethanol‐to‐butadiene conversion catalyzed by MgO was ethanol dehydrogenation and this step was strongly influenced by the Lewis acidity of the catalyst, of which result is, to some extent, in line with a recent study on ethanol dehydrogenation catalyzed by MgOSiO 2 . [ 49 ] DFT calculation showed that ZnO is a better catalyst in this step, where such a performance arisen from its stronger Lewis acidity. Moreover, another important aspect of ZnO is that the catalyst favors ethanol dehydrogenation over the dehydration, whose feature was opposite to that of MgO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our DFT calculations, most energy demanding process in the ethanol‐to‐butadiene conversion catalyzed by MgO was ethanol dehydrogenation and this step was strongly influenced by the Lewis acidity of the catalyst, of which result is, to some extent, in line with a recent study on ethanol dehydrogenation catalyzed by MgOSiO 2 . [ 49 ] DFT calculation showed that ZnO is a better catalyst in this step, where such a performance arisen from its stronger Lewis acidity. Moreover, another important aspect of ZnO is that the catalyst favors ethanol dehydrogenation over the dehydration, whose feature was opposite to that of MgO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of strongly-bound intermediates has been observed experimentally under similar conditions, for example by Abdulrazzaq et al who also found that the apparent activation energy for dehydrogenation was lower than that for dehydration and suggested the low apparent barrier for dehydrogenation was linked to the abundance of a stable surface species. 62 Strongly-bound surface species were also observed with in situ spectroscopy by Taifan et al, with identified species including adsorbed ethanol/ethyoxy, acetaldehyde, aldol condensation and polymerization products, and C 4 species such as butanol and crotyl alcohol. 25,61 Hayashi et al reported significant quantities of oxygenates and longer hydrocarbons on MgO.…”
Section: Microkinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 73%
“…High acetaldehyde selectivity relative to ethylene -greater than 80 % at 723 K with ethanol partial pressure less than 10 kPa -has also been observed experimentally for a model MgO/SBA-15 catalyst. 62 The TOF for ethanol dehydration and Prins condensation (p156) was predicted by the ES analysis to be determined by the stability of state 6C (C 4 H 8 O) and the barriers to reach transition states 5B and 6B (depending on temperature). With the microkinetic model, we found surface coverage to be mostly C 4 H 8 O, with early presence of adsorbed ethanol as well as hydroxide (Fig.…”
Section: Microkinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our DFT calculations, most energy demanding process in the ethanol-to-butadiene conversion catalyzed by MgO was ethanol dehydrogenation and this step was strongly influenced by the Lewis acidity of the catalyst, of which result is, to some extent, in line with a recent study on ethanol dehydrogenation catalyzed by MgO-SiO 2 . [52] DFT calculation showed that ZnO is a better catalyst in this step, where such a performance arisen from its stronger Lewis acidity. Moreover, another important aspect of ZnO is that the catalyst favors ethanol dehydrogenation over the dehydration, whose feature was opposite to that of MgO.…”
Section: Crotyl Alcohol Dehydrationmentioning
confidence: 98%