High-end organic–inorganic
lead halide perovskite semitransparent
p–i–n solar cells for tandem applications use a phenyl-C
61
-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM)/atomic layer deposition
(ALD)-SnO
x
electron transport layer stack.
Omitting the PCBM would be preferred for manufacturing, but has in
previous studies on (FA,MA)Pb(Br,I)
3
and (Cs,FA)Pb(Br,I)
3
and in this study on Cs
0.05
FA
0.79
MA
0.16
PbBr
0.51
I
2.49
(perovskite) led to
poor solar cell performance because of a bias-dependent light-generated
current. A direct ALD-SnO
x
exposure was therefore suggested to form a nonideal
perovskite/SnO
x
interface that acts as
a transport barrier for the light-generated current. To further investigate
the interface formation during the initial ALD SnO
x
growth on the perovskite, the mass dynamics of monitor crystals
coated by partial p–i–n solar cell stacks were recorded
in situ prior to and during the ALD using a quartz crystal microbalance.
Two major finds were made. A mass loss was observed prior to ALD for
growth temperatures above 60 °C, suggesting the decomposition
of the perovskite. In addition, a mostly irreversible mass gain was
observed during the first exposure to the Sn precursor tetrakis(dimethylamino)tin(IV)
that is independent of growth temperature and that disrupts the mass
gain of the following 20–50 ALD cycles. The chemical environments
of the buried interface were analyzed by soft and hard X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy for a sample with 50 ALD cycles of SnO
x
on the perovskite. Although measurements on the perovskite
bulk below and the SnO
x
film above did
not show chemical changes, additional chemical states for Pb, Br,
and N as well as a decrease in the amount of I were observed in the
interfacial region. From the analysis, these states and not the heating
of the perovskite were concluded to be the cause of the barrier. This
strongly suggests that the detrimental effects can be avoided by controlling
the interfacial design.