1951
DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1951.11010436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of Negro Children Toward Negro and White Teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clark & Clark, 1947, 1950Greenwald & Oppenheim, 1968;Lewis & Biber, 1951;Morland, 1962Morland, , 1966. Similar to prior studies on African-American preferences, Hispanic children in this study preferred skin tones lighter than their own.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Clark & Clark, 1947, 1950Greenwald & Oppenheim, 1968;Lewis & Biber, 1951;Morland, 1962Morland, , 1966. Similar to prior studies on African-American preferences, Hispanic children in this study preferred skin tones lighter than their own.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Early replications revealed that Caucasian children identified with their skin tone more often than African-American children (Goodman, 1952), whereas African-American children were more inclined to reject their own group's colouration and endorse greater preferences for lighter skin tones (Clark & Clark, 1947;Greenwald & Oppenheim, 1968;Lewis & Biber, 1951;Morland, 1962Morland, , 1966. This partiality towards Caucasian skin colouring and features has been linked to preferential treatment for White individuals and detrimental effects such as stigma and prejudice for minority persons throughout the United States' history (Davis, Daniels, & See, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The most revealing finding of the current study was that children showed no skin tone preference when shown a variety of skin tone cartoons and asked who they would pick as their "best friend." This discrepant finding might relate to the children having more choices because of the greater skin tone variations of the cartoon characters presented to them (i.e., white, light brown, medium brown, and black), as opposed to having to choose between a Black or a White doll as in previous studies (Clark & Clark, 1939;Davis, 2006;Greenwald & Oppenheim, 1968;Lewis & Biber, 1951;Morland, 1962Morland, , 1966 or it may relate to that measures were taken to control for demand characteristics. The hypothesis that more options may affect children's skin tone preferences was supported in the pre-post phase of the current study where children did demonstrate skin tone preferences, as previously reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Replication studies in the decades that followed revealed that White children identified with their skin tone more often than Black children (Goodman, 1952). In contrast, Black children were inclined to reject their own ethnic group and had greater preferences for White skin tone (Clark & Clark, 1947;Greenwald & Oppenheim, 1968;Lewis & Biber, 1951;Morland, 1962Morland, , 1966. Studies also revealed that Black children were persuaded by the majority norms, values, and pessimistic judgments about their racial or ethnic group (Clark, 1955;Stevenson & Stewart, 1958).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, once again when social class was considered there was some evidence that this factor was more important than race in determining pupils' attitudes towards teachers. In a relatively unsophisticated study by Lewis and Biber (1951) Negro children when given an opportunity expressed preference for white teachers; but those who had had a Negro teacher inclined towards choosing a Negro teacher.…”
Section: Social Perceptions and Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%