1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-8472(98)00023-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactions of Norway spruce and beech trees to 2 years of ozone exposure and episodic drought

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
13
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This water stress-induced reduction in net photosynthetic rate could result in the reduction of dry weight growth of B. ermanii. Our results agreed well with those of Beyers et al (1992) and Dixon et al (1998).…”
Section: Effects Of Soil Water Stresssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This water stress-induced reduction in net photosynthetic rate could result in the reduction of dry weight growth of B. ermanii. Our results agreed well with those of Beyers et al (1992) and Dixon et al (1998).…”
Section: Effects Of Soil Water Stresssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Similar results have been reported in other grass and tree species Izuta, Takahashi, Matsumura, & Totsuka, 1999). The reduction in NAR by O 3 has been reported as mainly caused by the inhibition of photosynthesis (Dixon et al, 1998;Greitner, Pell, & Winner, 1994;Reich, 1983). The net photosynthetic rate in the present study decreased more remarkably in the response to O 3 than the reduction in NAR (Figures 2 and 3), which suggested that the photosynthetic damage was gradually accumulated in leaves during O 3 exposure for 123 days.…”
Section: Effects Of Ozone Stresssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the protective effect of drought would only occur in severe drought conditions while under low water restriction the damage caused by O 3 appeared additive (Matyssek et al 2006;Pääkkönen et al 1998b). However, there are clear inter-and intraspecific differences in response to the combination of drought and O 3 (Dixon et al 1998). The protective effect of drought may be the result of stomatal exclusion of O 3 but also the induction of defence reactions (Matyssek et al 2006).…”
Section: Combination Of O 3 and Other Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%