2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-0518(20001101)38:21<3855::aid-pola20>3.3.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reactive poly(glycidyl methacrylate) microspheres prepared by dispersion polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another interesting feature of this technique is the possibility of achieving something similar to the gel effect that can be seen in bulk polymerization. [19] In a dispersion polymerization, the propagation may proceed simultaneously in the solution and particle phases. When growing oligomer radicals are captured by the particles the high viscosity inside the particles will reduce the termination rate, and hence, the molar mass will increase.…”
Section: Preparing Polymers With Different Molar Massesdispersion Polmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another interesting feature of this technique is the possibility of achieving something similar to the gel effect that can be seen in bulk polymerization. [19] In a dispersion polymerization, the propagation may proceed simultaneously in the solution and particle phases. When growing oligomer radicals are captured by the particles the high viscosity inside the particles will reduce the termination rate, and hence, the molar mass will increase.…”
Section: Preparing Polymers With Different Molar Massesdispersion Polmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In these experiments a modified version of a published procedure was used. [19] The chromatogram from the homopolymerization of NVP (polymer I), is shown in Figure 3 together with polymer H from the solution polymerization in benzene, and polymer K from the bulk polymerization.…”
Section: Preparing Polymers With Different Molar Massesdispersion Polmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameters measured by DLS are larger than those determined by SEM since the former technique determines the diameter of solvent-swollen particles, whereas the latter measures particles in the dry state. 16 At the end of the polymerization, the particle diameter is ca. 350 nm as determined by SEM, while the DLS determined diameter is ca.…”
Section: Kinetics Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the diameters measured by TEM and light scattering is due to the fact that the first method measures the dry diameter of the nanoparticles while the second one measures the hydrodynamic diameter, which takes into account also the surface adsorbed solvent (water) molecules. [25] Figure 2 describes the general scheme through which covalent and physical conjugation of thrombin onto the surface of the g-Fe 2 O 3 nanoparticles have been performed. These nanoparticles contain gelatin within and on the surface of the nanoparticles.…”
Section: Effect Of the Specific Inhibitor Antithrombin III On The Clomentioning
confidence: 99%