2018
DOI: 10.1177/1468017318767091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readability, suitability, and writing for clients with limited literacy skills

Abstract: Summary This study evaluated 56 documents developed by 11 nonprofit and public social service agencies to provide information to clients. The author used the Flesch Reading Ease, Simple Measure of Goobledegook (SMOG), and Gunning Fog Index formulas to assess reading grade levels and the Suitability Assessment of Material to evaluate overall suitability for readers with limited literacy skills. Findings All documents but one were above the recommended fifth grade level for low-literacy materials. Suitability As… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We developed and standardized a 6-week, home based, caregiver assisted neuropsychological rehabilitation program for adult patients with DRE [32] . This includes culturally suitable and readable graphic psychoeducational material on (a) neuropsychological consequences of epilepsy [33] and (b) compensatory training using internal and external aids as well as progressively difficult paper pencil tasks of visual attention, verbal memory and visual memory for cognitive retraining [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] . A weekly telephonic follow-up, compliance assessment and feedback were planned [9] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed and standardized a 6-week, home based, caregiver assisted neuropsychological rehabilitation program for adult patients with DRE [32] . This includes culturally suitable and readable graphic psychoeducational material on (a) neuropsychological consequences of epilepsy [33] and (b) compensatory training using internal and external aids as well as progressively difficult paper pencil tasks of visual attention, verbal memory and visual memory for cognitive retraining [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] . A weekly telephonic follow-up, compliance assessment and feedback were planned [9] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%