2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Readiness potentials driven by non-motoric processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the issue of volitionality was previously studied only in the context of overt behavior (Brass et al, 2013). Yet, later studies suggest that contributions from motor-related processes may not be necessary for RP generation (Alexander et al, 2016), or may be associated mainly with action consequences or outcomes, not the movement itself (Jo et al, 2014;Wen et al, 2018). For example, when a response is prepared and then abandoned (as in a NoGo condition), it is still preceded by RP (Alexander et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the issue of volitionality was previously studied only in the context of overt behavior (Brass et al, 2013). Yet, later studies suggest that contributions from motor-related processes may not be necessary for RP generation (Alexander et al, 2016), or may be associated mainly with action consequences or outcomes, not the movement itself (Jo et al, 2014;Wen et al, 2018). For example, when a response is prepared and then abandoned (as in a NoGo condition), it is still preceded by RP (Alexander et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the neural level, a slow negative potential appeared 1200 ms exclusively before intentional inhibition, which provides evidence that the RP also reflects the preparation of stopping a motor action. Together with the evidence that the RP develops prior to the process irrelevant to action [114][115][116] and its amplitude is influenced by the degree of intentionality [117][118][119], it is concluded that RP reflects neural processes related to intention formation rather than motor preparation [114,120,121]. This can also be interesting in relation to the current discussion on the brain disease model of addiction [122] and with respect to the question if long-term alcohol-dependent patients show problems in intention formation and/or execution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Interestingly, a smaller CNV occurs even when participants are not required to respond to the stimulus, suggesting that it also reflects nonmotor temporal processes (Rohrbaugh & Gaillard, 1983). The RP may also occur in the absence of immediate action, since it is apparently also found prior to "covert decisions" that do not immediately lead to actions (Alexander et al, 2016;Gluth et al, 2013). These findings indicate that the RP and CNV may reflect both motor preparation and temporal expectation.…”
Section: Planning Temporal Expectation and Actionmentioning
confidence: 88%