2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading emotional words within sentences: The impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
95
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
8
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in line with previous reports demonstrating modulations of emotion effects by varying task requirements (Bayer et al, 2010;Schupp et al, 2007a;Schacht & Sommer, 2009a,b). For instance, Schacht and Sommer 2009a using a lexical decision task reported an EPN in the same time range as it was observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is in line with previous reports demonstrating modulations of emotion effects by varying task requirements (Bayer et al, 2010;Schupp et al, 2007a;Schacht & Sommer, 2009a,b). For instance, Schacht and Sommer 2009a using a lexical decision task reported an EPN in the same time range as it was observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…During word processing, the LPC was the component of interest as our primary focus was in the intentional processing of these words (Brown et al, 2012;Citron, 2012). Consistent with the literature, a greater LPC over centro-parietal and parietal electrodes was expected to emerge for words high in valence, despite arousal levels (e.g., Bayer et al, 2010;Olofsson et al, 2008;Recio et al, 2014). That is, we did not expect an interaction of valence and arousal for LPC activity time locked to presentation of the cue.…”
Section: Objectives and Hypothesessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Although both valence and arousal seem to impact the LPC they do not necessarily interact such that greater amplification is often observed in emotional relative to neutral items regardless of arousal level (Bayer et al, 2010;Citron et al, 2013). In contrast to the EPN, the LPC is reflective of explicit processing and allocation of attentional resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies observe similar LPC effects for positive and negative words (Schacht), while other studies find bigger LPC for positive words (Herbert 2006), and yet other studies find a more negative ERP for emotionally negative words (Herbert 2008). A similar LPC effect has been found not only for single words, but also for emotion words embedded in sentence context (Bayer et al 2010;Holt et al 2008) and for emotional images (Schupp et al 2000). The LPC has been associated with motivational engagement (Schupp et al 2000), enhanced attention, and deeper stimulus encoding (Herbert et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%