2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.02957
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reading the CARDs: the Imprint of Accretion History in the Chemical Abundances of the Milky Way's Stellar Halo

Abstract: In the era of large-scale spectroscopic surveys in the Local Group (LG), we can explore using chemical abundances of halo stars to study the star formation and chemical enrichment histories of the dwarf galaxy progenitors of the Milky Way (MW) and M31 stellar halos. In this paper, we investigate using the Chemical Abundance Ratio Distributions (CARDs) of seven stellar halos from the Latte suite of FIRE-2 simulations. We attempt to infer galaxies' assembly histories by modelling the CARDs of the stellar halos o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…m12b and m12f demonstrate differences between DMO and CoSANG as one might expect; however m12i raises the question why it shows a different behavior to the two As discussed in section 5.2, m12i is a late forming halo and has a different merger history compared to m12b and m12f. This difference is reported in other similar studies of simulations that use the same initial conditions, where capturing the unusual accretion history of m12i becomes a challenge (Cunningham et al 2021). SAMs are sensitive to the merger history of the halo and this difference can The residual is the orientation of the axis at each radial bin (A in blue, B in red, and C in green) relative to the orientation of that axis in the innermost bin in both DMO (dashed) and CoSANG (solid), The haloes have a relatively consistent orientation at all distances.…”
Section: Diversity Of Substructurescontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…m12b and m12f demonstrate differences between DMO and CoSANG as one might expect; however m12i raises the question why it shows a different behavior to the two As discussed in section 5.2, m12i is a late forming halo and has a different merger history compared to m12b and m12f. This difference is reported in other similar studies of simulations that use the same initial conditions, where capturing the unusual accretion history of m12i becomes a challenge (Cunningham et al 2021). SAMs are sensitive to the merger history of the halo and this difference can The residual is the orientation of the axis at each radial bin (A in blue, B in red, and C in green) relative to the orientation of that axis in the innermost bin in both DMO (dashed) and CoSANG (solid), The haloes have a relatively consistent orientation at all distances.…”
Section: Diversity Of Substructurescontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In this situation, the chemical abundances of stars are the only fossil records of the physical conditions of the star formation in the galaxies at different epochs. Therefore, by making an analysis of the chemical abundance patterns of resolved stellar populations in the halo combined together with the phase-space data one could extract precise information about the galactic building blocks (Font et al 2006;Cunningham et al 2021;Deason et al 2016;Roederer et al 2018;Helmi 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%