2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

REAK: Reliability analysis through Error rate-based Adaptive Kriging

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the neighbors of u are bounded by a niche. The radius of niche is estimated by the density of current candidate solutions and adaptively changed along with generation t, as shown in Equation (18).…”
Section: Exploration Of Multiple Mppsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the neighbors of u are bounded by a niche. The radius of niche is estimated by the density of current candidate solutions and adaptively changed along with generation t, as shown in Equation (18).…”
Section: Exploration Of Multiple Mppsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum (or minimum) point, also called as the best next point, is expected to maximally enhance the Kriging. Several learning functions have been proposed from different perspectives, including U function [41], the expected feasibility function (EFF) [29], cumulative confidence level (CCL) [32], the expected risk function (ERF) [42], information entropy-based function H [43], least improvement function [44], the reliability-based expected improvement function [45], and error rate-based adaptive Kriging [46]. In spite of their differences, all learning function intends to enhance Kriging with points in the vicinity of limit state surface.…”
Section: G T T Xzmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al [21]. Other methods have also been presented to address specific problems such as small failure probabilities (rare events) estimations [3,22,23,24,25,7,26] , multiple failure regions problems [27,28,29,30] or systems failure probabilities assessment [6,31,5,2,9,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%