2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10660-013-9125-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real e-customer behavioural responses to free delivery and free returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
35
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They suggest that from an economic perspective, such a return policy is not recommended. Lantz and Hjort [99] confirm that free returns can reduce the average value of orders. Hjort and Lantz [101] further demonstrate that the free-return policy does not contribute to retailers' long-term profitability, but repeat customers can generate more contributions.…”
Section: Area 4 Reverse Logistics In Fashion Retailingmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They suggest that from an economic perspective, such a return policy is not recommended. Lantz and Hjort [99] confirm that free returns can reduce the average value of orders. Hjort and Lantz [101] further demonstrate that the free-return policy does not contribute to retailers' long-term profitability, but repeat customers can generate more contributions.…”
Section: Area 4 Reverse Logistics In Fashion Retailingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Studies on the return policy between consumers and retailers focus on two aspects: the effect of the policy on customer behavior and loyalty [94][95][96][97][98], and the effect of the policy on retailers' profitability [99,100]. Most studies from the customer behavior perspective show that this type of return policy can attract more consumers and create more loyal customers [101].…”
Section: Area 4 Reverse Logistics In Fashion Retailingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the AR classifier, research suggests that monetary leniency can stimulate liking toward a retailer's return policy (Posselt et al, ) and decrease postreturn regret (Bower & Maxham III, ). In general, there is strong empirical evidence that higher monetary leniency results in favorable customer behavioral intentions and actions from a retailer's perspective (Gelbrich et al, ; Lantz & Hjort, ; Pei et al, ; Zhang et al, ).…”
Section: Empirical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petersen and Kumar (2010) Secondary data Mixon (1999), Heim and Field (2007), Posselt, Gerstner, and Radic (2008), Anderson et al (2009a), Bonifield et al (2010), Zhou and Hinz (2016), Hjort and Lantz (2016), and Shang, Pekgün, Ferguson, and Galbreth (2017) Literature content Heiman, McWilliams, and Zilberman (2001) and Janakiraman et al (2016) T Wood (2001), Heim and Field (2007), Bower and Maxham III (2012), Lantz and Hjort (2013), and Hjort and Lantz (2016) Time leniency d'Astous and Guèvremont (2008) Heim and Field (2007) Scope leniency Wood (2001) and Kim and Wansink (2012) Wood (2001) Wood ( potential value of losses and gains rather than on the final outcome. With its emphasis on loss aversion, this theory provides an important theoretical lens to study cognitive and behavioral responses of customers toward return policies that typically lead to monetary losses due to low monetary and/or exchange leniency (Heiman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In e-commerce, one leniency variable that exists for both deliveries and returns is whether customers pay for shipping or the company entirely subsidizes it. Lantz & Hjort (2013) [49] proposed a basic price theory which suggests that if a service is free, it will generally have a higher demand than if it were not free. If this theory holds, then free deliveries should correspond to higher sales, and free returns should correspond to both higher sales and increased returns.…”
Section: Variety Of Servicementioning
confidence: 99%