It is to the great merit of the International Vitreomacular Traction (VMT) Study Group that the new classification brought clarity by reflecting the standards of modern ocular coherence (OCT) imaging [1]. These activities go back to the pioneers of pharmacologic vitreolysis [2]. The dream of replacing sophisticated intraocular surgery with a single administration of a vitreolytic agent is intriguing. The illusion of a simple injection as the solution to most cases might have slightly blurred the borders, when the medical art of doing nothing still might be the best choice anyway. A more realistic assessment started after the sobering news of transient or even permanent toxicity related to ocriplasmin [3].It is thanks to Peter Stalmans that the body of evidence regarding the natural history of VMT has increased further [4]. The retrospective study was funded, but not influenced by ThromboGenics. The excellent flowchart provided in the study (Figure 4: outcomes by baseline disease) displays how the different subgroups developed during the short follow-up period of 11 months:-Patients with vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) showed a similar rate of progression and resolution. However, the large majority (95.2 %) did not receive any treatment, though the amount of (on request) reported metarmophopsia was found to be around one in five (18 %). -In patients with vitreomacular traction (VMT) the chance of spontaneous resolution (22.7 %) and the risk of undergoing vitrectomy (25.6 %) appeared to be balanced [4]. In particular regarding the latter group, bias cannot be ruled out, as the cohort of a tertiary centre might not be representative in terms of comorbidities. Moreover, the decision might strongly depend also on the more or less aggressive approach and information policy of the individual surgeon. -The number of cases with macular holes and concomitant VMT was quite small (9.5 %). The rate of surgery did not differ from other cases with macular holes (88.7 % vs. 86.4 %). It is a limitation of the study that the author did not apply the differentiation of his own classification (small vs. large holes) and the individual peculiarity that silicone oil was used during every surgery. Therefore, we do not wish to comment on the decision regarding vitrectomy for macular holes, which might be recommended often, -at least in our experience, except in cases with a poor prognosis due to the long duration (not so seldom) and/or any end-stage atrophy.This study is of importance, as the MIVI trials did not provide comprehensive knowledge of natural disease history in the absence of a real Bplacebo^group [2]. In addition, the follow-up of the RCTs was quite short considering the situation that the story, including partial resolution, is not over after 4 weeks or 6 months, and the rate of spontaneous VMT resolution has been found to continuously rise over time [5].