“…In order to evaluate the collision avoidance algorithm proposed in the paper, classic AEB algorithms including Berkley, Mazda, Honda and SeungwukMoon (Fujita et al, 1995;Doi et al, 1994;Seiler et al, 1998;Moon and Yi, 2008) were also tested for comparison. All tests were implemented via the Prescan Simulation Platform (Prescan, 2018), with vehicle maximum deceleration set at 0.8 g (to account for possible unfavorable driving situations, where generally a maximum deceleration of 10 m/s 2 and 8 m/s is assumed for dry and wet roads respectively for AEB systems (Jeppsson et al, 2018)) and road friction coefficient set at 0.8, and using Prescan built-in 2D simple vehicle dynamics model and radar sensor model ("2D simple" refers to "a model that is capable of simulating a car's longitudinal, lateral and roll motion", but neglects vehicle movement in the vertical direction and assumes the front/rear two tires have the same angle and speed like a bicycle, also referred to as bicycle models (Prescan, 2018)). Finally, simulation results of each algorithm under each test scenario were obtained and shown in Fig.…”