1991
DOI: 10.1351/pac199163050711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real surface area measurements in electrochemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
1,024
1
17

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,666 publications
(1,060 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
18
1,024
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Charge required for dessorption and calculated from the reduction peak area with one electron process assumption [41] was used for the estimation of surface concentration of adsorbed disulfide after 24 hours of incubation, which was 1.7 nmols·cm -2 . Taking into account the roughness coefficient of the gold electrodes about 3.9 [41,42], the value of 0.4 nmols·cm -2 of disulfide surface concentration was calculated, which is close to theoretical value of 0.8 nmols·cm -2 for condensed monolayer [36].…”
Section: Functional Sam On Gold Surfacesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Charge required for dessorption and calculated from the reduction peak area with one electron process assumption [41] was used for the estimation of surface concentration of adsorbed disulfide after 24 hours of incubation, which was 1.7 nmols·cm -2 . Taking into account the roughness coefficient of the gold electrodes about 3.9 [41,42], the value of 0.4 nmols·cm -2 of disulfide surface concentration was calculated, which is close to theoretical value of 0.8 nmols·cm -2 for condensed monolayer [36].…”
Section: Functional Sam On Gold Surfacesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The gold NPs of 15 nm average diameter were prepared by the procedure of Turkevich et al [41] and Frens [42]. The effective area of the electrode was estimated by integration of the Au-O reduction peak at 1.1 V in the cyclic voltammogram recorded in 0.1 M H2SO4 and taking a value of 390 μC.cm -2 for a gold oxide surface [43]. Different modifications of the gold surface were probed as follows: i) 1mM solution of mercaptopropionic acid in water, ii) cysteamine in water, iii) 6-mercaptohexanoic acid in ethanol, iv) a 1/1 mixture of 6-mercaptohexan-1-ol and 1-hexanethiol in ethanol.…”
Section: Voltammetric Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the surface area of the porous gold was determined first by integrating the reduction peak area of oxidized gold layer formed by cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans from −0.2 to +1.6 V in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 [20,21]. The average value of the electroactive surface area of the electrode can be calculated according to the Randles-Sevcik equation [22].…”
Section: Estimation Of the Active Surface Area Of The Electrodementioning
confidence: 99%