Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3408877.3432432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real Talk: Saturated Sites of Violence in CS Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study, women who were randomly assigned to male majority teams were less willing to become team leaders than women assigned to women majority teams [8]. It is further important to consider intersectional identities in this [46][47][48]. This literature leads us to strongly believe that we should ensure that no students experience solo or singleton status in study groups.…”
Section: Group Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, women who were randomly assigned to male majority teams were less willing to become team leaders than women assigned to women majority teams [8]. It is further important to consider intersectional identities in this [46][47][48]. This literature leads us to strongly believe that we should ensure that no students experience solo or singleton status in study groups.…”
Section: Group Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second mode of criticality focuses on the inverse: “the world in computing.” In this approach, computing is understood as a site of social activity (rather than as a tool for influencing society) where social hierarchies are reproduced in new forms. This approach might focus on sexism in gaming communities and dating apps, or on how computing education and computing careers are themselves sites of racial violence (Rankin et al, 2021). Recent work puts these two approaches in dialogue with one another, showing how critical transformation of computing classrooms allows them to catalyze student activism more broadly (Ryoo et al, 2020).…”
Section: Three Framings Of Computational Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a provocation, what would it look like for a social platform to be built by and for Black people, taking into consideration the benefits and challenges to inform the creation of that new digital space in order to foster connectivity, survival, and a means to thrive? Given the lack of Black representation in Silicon Valley and the field of computer science as a whole, including structural inequities in computing education that continue to enact oppression [80], the suggestion that Black people should be more involved in designing and building technology is both important and challenging. One way to involve perspectives and values of the Black diaspora is to incorporate Afrofuturism into the process for designing technology.…”
Section: Black To the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%