2016
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2478755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Algorithm for Versatile Displacement Sensors Based on Self-Mixing Interferometry

Abstract: This paper presents a general displacement reconstruction algorithm for sensors based on self-mixing (SM) interferometry suitable to work at different optical feedback conditions. The approach relies on a robust phase observation through analytic signals for the fringe detection stage, while the motion of the pointed target is retrieved by a self-adapting filter in a piece-wise basis. The implementation for real-time calculations demonstrates the feasibility of robust SM sensors for different usage conditions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When input SM signal convolves with impulse response of MF1 it gives high amplitudes where forward fringes occur in input SM signal on same time axis as shown in Figure 1b, whereas high amplitudes are obtained at the output of MF2 wherever backward fringes occur in input SM signal as shown in Figure 1c. However it is worth-mentioning that the shown output of MF2 is actually inverted as it is a requirement of phase unwrapping methods [4][5][6][7]. A nice performance of DBT method significantly degrades for a low SNR SM signal (presented in Figure 2a).…”
Section: Selection Of Mf Templatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When input SM signal convolves with impulse response of MF1 it gives high amplitudes where forward fringes occur in input SM signal on same time axis as shown in Figure 1b, whereas high amplitudes are obtained at the output of MF2 wherever backward fringes occur in input SM signal as shown in Figure 1c. However it is worth-mentioning that the shown output of MF2 is actually inverted as it is a requirement of phase unwrapping methods [4][5][6][7]. A nice performance of DBT method significantly degrades for a low SNR SM signal (presented in Figure 2a).…”
Section: Selection Of Mf Templatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For high precision displacement retrieval using SM sensor, one can one of many phase unwrapping methods (PUMs) [4][5][6][7]. These PUMs all are based on correct detection of all SM fringes contained in the acquired SM signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Displacement and vibration sensing using SMI has been actively researched and many digital signal processing (DSP) algorithms (based on unwrapping of laser phase under optical feedback) have been published [9][10][11][12][13], providing measurement precision ranging from λ/8 to λ/50. However, in the presence of speckle [14], such high precision SMI displacement retrieval is greatly reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sharp discontinuity within such fringes was used for individual fringe detection while the quasi-linearity of such fringes with remote target motion was used to produce an unwrapped analog output signal. In spite of elegance of this method, presence of speckle drastically degrades the performance of this method (just as it does for digital unwrapping methods [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been continuous interest to propose various phase unwrapping methods, principally under stable optical feedback coupling, providing varying degrees of measurement precision ranging from λ/8 to λ/40 [5]- [10]. However, such results can never be attained unless individual fringe detection is correctly carried out.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%