2015 7th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ner.2015.7146700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time closed-loop FES control of muscle activation with evoked EMG feedback

Abstract: Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is a useful technique for restoring motor functions for spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. Muscle contractions can be artificially driven through delivery of electrical pulses to impaired muscles, and the electrical activity of contracted muscles under stimulus recorded by electromyography (EMG) is called M-wave. The FES-induced muscle activation which is represented by evoked EMG recordings can indicate the muscle state. Accurate control of muscle activation level by F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is to say, the EMG signals from the unaffected forearm were used as reference to evaluate the mirror symmetric muscle in the affected side forearm. Thus, different from the closed-loop FES studied in [28], [38], [39], which concentrated on the FES control strategies based on the FES-induced EMG rather than sensing the patients' neuromuscular pathological state, the FES in this study was driven by the EMG bias, so that it could not only avoid the unnecessary stimulation on the unaffected nerves and muscles to reduce the sufferings of users but also alleviate muscle fatigue compared to the cycling fixed intensity FES used in clinical. Furthermore, the designed system had advantages of wireless communication, multiple channels, portable size and real-time capability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…That is to say, the EMG signals from the unaffected forearm were used as reference to evaluate the mirror symmetric muscle in the affected side forearm. Thus, different from the closed-loop FES studied in [28], [38], [39], which concentrated on the FES control strategies based on the FES-induced EMG rather than sensing the patients' neuromuscular pathological state, the FES in this study was driven by the EMG bias, so that it could not only avoid the unnecessary stimulation on the unaffected nerves and muscles to reduce the sufferings of users but also alleviate muscle fatigue compared to the cycling fixed intensity FES used in clinical. Furthermore, the designed system had advantages of wireless communication, multiple channels, portable size and real-time capability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…With this information, it modulates the pulse width to follow a desired trajectory and the eEMG model is updated. The system was tested on able-bodied subjects and SCI patients, and the results verify its feasibility and efficiency [75][76][77][78].…”
Section: Stimulation Based On Emgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This facilitates the prediction of the muscle response and then the system can respond to time-variant muscle state changes toward muscle-response-aware FES control. It was further implemented combined with a wireless portable stimulator (Toussaint et al, 2010 ) to achieve real-time FES control (Li et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Personalized Electrical Stimulation Through Evoked Emgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A real-time implementation of the predictive model controller for online control of muscle activation is as follows (Li et al, 2015 ): The reference muscle activation trajectory is prepared before beginning estimation and control; Trapezoidal shape pulse width stimulation at different amplitude levels is tested while recording the eEMG to personalize the model regarding the relationship between the pulse width and MAV of eEMG via Kalman filter; After the identification phase ends, the FES system goes into control mode. The stimulator is driven by a predictive controller to modulate the pulse width to track the desired muscle activation trajectory while the stimulation-to-eEMG model is being updated to correspond to the time-variant properties.…”
Section: Muscle Activation Predictive Control and Cancelation Of Tmentioning
confidence: 99%