2010
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201002121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real‐Time DNA Detection Using Reduced Graphene Oxide Field Effect Transistors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18] GO can be thermally or chemically reduced or modified to tune the material properties, and has been successfully utilized in molecular hybrids [19,20] or composites, [21][22][23][24][25] biocompatible scaffolds or substrates, [26,27] and patterned carbon films. [28,29] In recent years, graphene-based biodevices, such as DNA carriers, [30,31] graphene nanopores for DNA sequencing, [32] and a graphene-DNA biosensor, [33,34] have been highlighted with extraordinary sensitivity, [34,35] rapid readout, [36] and good biostability. [37] These devices frequently employ singlestranded DNAs (ssDNAs) adsorbed through p-p stacking interaction between the nucleobases and the graphene surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[16][17][18] GO can be thermally or chemically reduced or modified to tune the material properties, and has been successfully utilized in molecular hybrids [19,20] or composites, [21][22][23][24][25] biocompatible scaffolds or substrates, [26,27] and patterned carbon films. [28,29] In recent years, graphene-based biodevices, such as DNA carriers, [30,31] graphene nanopores for DNA sequencing, [32] and a graphene-DNA biosensor, [33,34] have been highlighted with extraordinary sensitivity, [34,35] rapid readout, [36] and good biostability. [37] These devices frequently employ singlestranded DNAs (ssDNAs) adsorbed through p-p stacking interaction between the nucleobases and the graphene surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38] DNA origami structures, which consist of duplex DNA, require different surface interactions for adsorption because of the conformational screening of the nucleobases. [36,39] In addition, the substrate surface must be atomically smooth for reliable AFM imaging of the about 2 nm thick DNA origami structures. [39][40][41][42] Because of these stringent requirements, substrate materials for DNA origami studies have been restricted to mica, [39] silica, [7,40,41] and a few selfassembled monolayers (SAMs) [8,9,42] thus far.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, graphene functionalization may require some further considerations. For instance, the use of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) involved a different chemical approach [16]. The covalent attachment of receptors to rGO was particularly challenging since the reduction process removed the main functional groups on the surface (carboxyl, epoxide…).…”
Section: Amidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the XPS could be performed directly on the surface and the analysis of each functionalization steps gives some hints on the correct immobilization process with a particular benefit for covalent approaches. The carbon and nitrogen bonds could be analyzed by this technique and revealed specific spectra for the chemical functions involved [16]. Raman analysis could also be performed on the electrode surface to characterize the immobilization.…”
Section: On the Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemically modified graphenes with adjustable surface chemistry have offered competitive results in biological FETs [72][73][74]. In the label-free detection, one of the pressing problems was the response to non-specific binding.…”
Section: Electrical Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%