2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2018.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time dose-rate monitoring with gynecologic brachytherapy: Results of an initial clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have used IVD during HDR-VBT. The aim of IVD was mostly for real-time dose-rate monitoring and dose verification for quality assurance purposes [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. One study used IVD to measure the actual dose to the rectum during HDR-VBT and compared it to the rectal dose as determined by the treatment planning system (TPS); the mean dose discrepancy was 2.2 Gy [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies have used IVD during HDR-VBT. The aim of IVD was mostly for real-time dose-rate monitoring and dose verification for quality assurance purposes [ 29 , 30 , 31 ]. One study used IVD to measure the actual dose to the rectum during HDR-VBT and compared it to the rectal dose as determined by the treatment planning system (TPS); the mean dose discrepancy was 2.2 Gy [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this setup, the standard error of the mean is equal to 50% of the standard deviation. This dose difference is in the range of published uncertainties for in vivo dosimetry in HDR brachytherapy [2,12]. Finally, all ten fractions of the clinical HDR plan were consecutively delivered, amounting to a dose of at least 300 Gy to the surface of the applicator, and the applicator was monitored for structural damage.…”
Section: Testing and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this setup, the standard error of the mean is equal to 50% of the standard deviation. This dose difference is in the range of published uncertainties for in vivo dosimetry in HDR brachytherapy (Mason et al 2016;Belley et al 2018). Finally, all ten fractions of the clinical HDR plan were consecutively delivered, amounting to a dose of at least 300 Gy to the surface of the applicator, and the applicator was monitored for structural damage.…”
Section: Testing and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%