2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.102.014308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time dynamics of string breaking in quantum spin chains

Abstract: String breaking is a central dynamical process in theories featuring confinement, where a string connecting two charges decays at the expense of the creation of new particle-antiparticle pairs. Here, we show that this process can also be observed in quantum Ising chains where domain walls get confined either by a symmetry-breaking field or by long-range interactions. We find that string breaking occurs, in general, as a two-stage process. First, the initial charges remain essentially static and stable. The con… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unitary dynamics from the reset state |j (j = 1, 2), |ψ j (τ ) = exp(−iHτ ) |j (setting = 1), between consecutive resets stems therefore from a quench of the transverse field from the pre-quench h 0 = 0 to the post-quench value h [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. The experimental motivation behind the conditional reset protocol comes from recent results on Rydberg quantum simulators [64], which allow to experimentally implement Ising models with transverse and longitudinal fields [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] and permit, at the same time, the spatially resolved detection of the spin state upon which the reset is conditioned. Such measurement has been indeed implemented in Rydberg atoms experiments on quantum quenches of the Ising model [73][74][75][76].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unitary dynamics from the reset state |j (j = 1, 2), |ψ j (τ ) = exp(−iHτ ) |j (setting = 1), between consecutive resets stems therefore from a quench of the transverse field from the pre-quench h 0 = 0 to the post-quench value h [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. The experimental motivation behind the conditional reset protocol comes from recent results on Rydberg quantum simulators [64], which allow to experimentally implement Ising models with transverse and longitudinal fields [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] and permit, at the same time, the spatially resolved detection of the spin state upon which the reset is conditioned. Such measurement has been indeed implemented in Rydberg atoms experiments on quantum quenches of the Ising model [73][74][75][76].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ferromagnetic case, this immediately leads to confinement of fermionic domain walls into bosonic magnons [6][7][8][9]. Recent studies of the Ising chain in a tilted field concentrated on aspects of anomalously slow dynamics [10][11][12][13][14], quantum scarring [15,16], prethermalization [17], fractons [18], meson scattering [19,20] and dynamics of the false vacuum [21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction -Identifying the origin of a linear attractive potential between charges mediated by gauge fields, known as confinement, and studying its consequences has been a longstanding challenge in nuclear, high-energy and condensedmatter physics [1][2][3][4]. Recently, consequences of confinement on real-time quantum dynamics in spin chains and equivalent lattice gauge theories have been studied extensively [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Generically, confinement is known to hinder quantum thermalization and slow quantum dynamics by strongly suppressing the spreading of quantum correlations and entanglement growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a state fully filled with fermions. In order to follow the time evolution of this state, one needs to solve the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, which for this case reads [47] i∂ T ψ m = −t(ψ m+1 + ψ m−1 ) + h(1 + (−1) m+1 )ψ m (7) revealing an effective zig-zag potential (albeit with the opposite sign as compared to Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%