2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92082-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-time prediction of Poisson’s ratio from drilling parameters using machine learning tools

Abstract: Rock elastic properties such as Poisson’s ratio influence wellbore stability, in-situ stresses estimation, drilling performance, and hydraulic fracturing design. Conventionally, Poisson’s ratio estimation requires either laboratory experiments or derived from sonic logs, the main concerns of these methods are the data and samples availability, costs, and time-consumption. In this paper, an alternative real-time technique utilizing drilling parameters and machine learning was presented. The main added value of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AI has been broadly applied in oil and gas industry because it has not only the capability to solve complicated issues, but it also represents them with a high accuracy 27 . Intelligent models were developed for various targets such as estimating the equivalent circulation density in real-time 28 – 30 , pore pressure estimation while drilling 31 , 32 , porosity prediction 33 , resistivity prediction 34 , predicting mud rheological properties 35 39 , predicting the unconfined compressive strength 40 , estimating the oil recovery factor 41 , bulk density log prediction 42 , 43 , well planning 44 , lithology classification 45 , fracture density estimation 46 , estimating the static elastic moduli 47 , 48 , Poisson’s ratio prediction 49 51 , and prediction of formation tops 52 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI has been broadly applied in oil and gas industry because it has not only the capability to solve complicated issues, but it also represents them with a high accuracy 27 . Intelligent models were developed for various targets such as estimating the equivalent circulation density in real-time 28 – 30 , pore pressure estimation while drilling 31 , 32 , porosity prediction 33 , resistivity prediction 34 , predicting mud rheological properties 35 39 , predicting the unconfined compressive strength 40 , estimating the oil recovery factor 41 , bulk density log prediction 42 , 43 , well planning 44 , lithology classification 45 , fracture density estimation 46 , estimating the static elastic moduli 47 , 48 , Poisson’s ratio prediction 49 51 , and prediction of formation tops 52 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that the predictability of the applied model led to RMSE = 0.0612/MAE = 0.0442 and RMSE = 0.0806/MAE = 0.0660 error rates in the training and testing stages, respectively. Siddig et al [ 43 ] utilized the ANFIS and MLP on extensive data logs recovered from a drilled well to predict the Poisson’s ratio variation on host sedimentary rocks. Both methods provided an R 2 , MLP, and ANFIS of 0.97, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 As abundant data are collected, one well-trained neural network is capable of the real-time 33 prediction of mechanical properties, such as Poisson's ratio. 34 Moreover, ML can be taken as an agent, reflected by the convolutional neural network (CNN) 33 model formulated to predict the thermal conductivity of porous graphene. 5 Noticeably, an inverse design methodology based on ML is also performed to determine the optimal choice of porous graphene with the lowest thermal conductivity, revealing the relationship between the hole distribution and thermal conductivity reduction in monolayer graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%