1987
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bb.16.060187.002403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Spectroscopic Analysis of Ligand-Receptor Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second assumption is that the rates of activators binding to channels are much faster than the time scales for the activators to stimulate the channels. This assumption is in agreement with the general experimental observation that ligand-receptor binding is at the level of a microsecond (Sktar, 1987 ) and our recent observation that, in the presence of ztz240, the closing of KCNQ2 takes approximately 10 s (Gao et al, 2010 ). These two assumptions enable us to apply equilibrium thermodynamic tools to develop the activation model of ztz240 binding to KCNQ2.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The second assumption is that the rates of activators binding to channels are much faster than the time scales for the activators to stimulate the channels. This assumption is in agreement with the general experimental observation that ligand-receptor binding is at the level of a microsecond (Sktar, 1987 ) and our recent observation that, in the presence of ztz240, the closing of KCNQ2 takes approximately 10 s (Gao et al, 2010 ). These two assumptions enable us to apply equilibrium thermodynamic tools to develop the activation model of ztz240 binding to KCNQ2.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Dictyostelium chemoattractant receptors do not have such high affinities (Janssens and Van Haastert, 1987), and increases in bound ligand due to the affinity are unlikely to occur in these cells. On the contrary, neutrophils do have high-affinity receptors for chemoattractants (Sklar, 1987), and these affinity properties have been used for detailed comparisons of ligand-receptor kinetics with downstream signaling pathways in neutrophils (Sklar, 1987), although not in studies involving spatial gradients of fluorescent ligands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, at small values of Ta, (0) increases *For a diffusion-limited ligand-receptor interaction (51), where the lateral translational diffusion coefficient (D) of the receptor is typically between 10-"-10-8 cm2/s (52). tSmaller values are seen when the receptor-ligand interaction is not diffusion limited (53). with Ta.…”
Section: Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%