2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2017.0047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real‐time vehicle detection and counting in complex traffic scenes using background subtraction model with low‐rank decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, vehicle tracking was not used for vehicle counting in the three methods mentioned in [2,27,31]. Moreover, Yang et al [32] adopted background subtraction method for vehicle detection and Kalman filter algorithm for vehicle tracking to achieve vehicle counting. However, vehicle counting employed Deep Neural Networks (DNN) for vehicle detection and KLT tracker for vehicle tracking were proposed by Abdelwahab [16].…”
Section: Results and Discussion Of Vehicle Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, vehicle tracking was not used for vehicle counting in the three methods mentioned in [2,27,31]. Moreover, Yang et al [32] adopted background subtraction method for vehicle detection and Kalman filter algorithm for vehicle tracking to achieve vehicle counting. However, vehicle counting employed Deep Neural Networks (DNN) for vehicle detection and KLT tracker for vehicle tracking were proposed by Abdelwahab [16].…”
Section: Results and Discussion Of Vehicle Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the background subtraction method in image processing to detect vehicles, the accuracy of our deep learning-based detection method has been greatly improved. On the other hand, compared with KLT [16] and Kalman filter tracking algorithms [32], our proposed tracking algorithm does not need to predict the vehicle position. Instead, it considers the occlusion, deformation, and other problems caused by the vehicle movement, in which constraints have greatly improved tracking efficiency and accuracy.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Of Vehicle Countingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this, many researchers devote to the research on this hot topic. For decades of years, many algorithms and frameworks are proposed [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. Due to the development of computer vision technology and the popularity of the camera, the vision-based detection and tracking have became the most popular research branch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regard to the detection, there are two technical frameworks: appearance-feature and motion-based. For the former, the appearance, such as the size, shape and color etc is extracted by some typical descriptors including HOG, SURF, gabor, Harris and optical flow etc [4][5][6][7][8]. Considering the dynamic of vehicle, motion-based algorithms are given in [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed to achieve vehicle counting in unconstrained environments by relying on portable roadside sensors [5] or IoT using Raspberry Pi [6]. Promising results have also been demonstrated in recent studies that utilises conventional computer vision techniques [3,8,9,10] and convolutional neural network (CNN) based method [7]. Vehicle counting is generally accomplished by first inferring motion flow of objects in a video sequence, followed by using the detected salience or statistical features to count number of objects [8,9,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%