2021
DOI: 10.3390/math9060646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time Wind Field Estimation and Pitot Tube Calibration Using an Extended Kalman Filter

Abstract: The airspeed is an important feedback signal for flight control, and its measurement accuracy is related to the safety of aircraft, especially for hybrid vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) in the transition phase. However, offline calibration of the pitot tube cannot fully simulate the situation in real cases, and this is why online calibration after installation is necessary. In addition, the environmental wind field creates a high risk for the conversion flight of a hybrid UAV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 6, the relative error that affected airspeed measurements was found to be less than 9% in all the test scenarios considered, or less than 5% if we excluded test case 4 shown in Table 6, relative to a nonrealistic value of the AOA (which was typically in the range of −2 • to 15 • ). The estimation errors of α, β, and V CAS were found to be within 1.7 • (excluding the nonrealistic case α = 45 • ), 0.5 • , and 1.4 m/s, respectively, in good agreement with the theoretical values derived from the law of error propagation, and consistent with other authors' work [15,19,20,26]. The proposed approach showed a promising potentiality for implementation of real-time control laws to increase the flight envelope by exploiting attitude measurements and direct knowledge of α and β.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Worksupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 6, the relative error that affected airspeed measurements was found to be less than 9% in all the test scenarios considered, or less than 5% if we excluded test case 4 shown in Table 6, relative to a nonrealistic value of the AOA (which was typically in the range of −2 • to 15 • ). The estimation errors of α, β, and V CAS were found to be within 1.7 • (excluding the nonrealistic case α = 45 • ), 0.5 • , and 1.4 m/s, respectively, in good agreement with the theoretical values derived from the law of error propagation, and consistent with other authors' work [15,19,20,26]. The proposed approach showed a promising potentiality for implementation of real-time control laws to increase the flight envelope by exploiting attitude measurements and direct knowledge of α and β.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Worksupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The sensors used in this research are a differential pressure sensor and a 10 degrees of freedom (DoF) inertial measurement unit (IMU), both managed by a microcontroller Arduino for data acquisition and TAS, AOA, and AOS estimation. We used 1D Kalman filtering to estimate and remove measurement noise, and complementary filtering was used to provide an estimate of the attitude from IMU acceleration and angular rate data [25,26]. Indoor sessions were needed for system setup and calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the middle phase of UAV flight, the flight state is controlled based on the flight speed, specifically the airspeed value. Common methods for measuring the UAV airspeed include a pitot tube velocity measurement [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], integrated GPS with low-cost inertial navigation systems (IMU), and others [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. For UAVs where precision in airspeed measurement is not crucial, the high cost of integrating GPS with IMU can be prohibitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It serves as a vital indicator for UAV control, enabling functions such as navigation, positioning, flight performance monitoring, maintaining flight stability, and enhancing flight safety. Common methods for measuring airspeed in UAVs include Pitot tube velocity measurements [1][2][3][4] and integrated Global Positioning System (GPSs) with low-cost Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) [5][6][7][8] . For small UAVs with lower cost and less stringent airspeed measurement requirements, GPS and IMU strategies can be expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%