2022
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real‐world application of a fast stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening in primary screening positive population

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cross-sectional study, which included 24,613 subjects with a positive rate of FOBT or HRFQ of 28.5% in CRC screening, examined the relation between changeable risk factors and the high-risk rate of CRC utilizing the IPTW method based on propensity scores, which produced less biased effect estimates than the conventional correction procedure. 16 Compared to other developed cities in China like Shanghai (29%), Guangzhou (16.77%), and Tianjin (5.57%), [17][18][19] as well as developed country like Germany (12.0%) and France (6.2%), 20,21 the present results suggest that the detection rate of CRC high-risk in permanent residents of Shenzhen was relatively high, and the prevention of CRC is facing great challenges, and it was also of great significance for improving the health literacy level. The risk variables derived from the IPTW included six well-known modifiable factors (smoking and drinking status, obesity, red and processed meat) that were excluded in the present CRC screening methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cross-sectional study, which included 24,613 subjects with a positive rate of FOBT or HRFQ of 28.5% in CRC screening, examined the relation between changeable risk factors and the high-risk rate of CRC utilizing the IPTW method based on propensity scores, which produced less biased effect estimates than the conventional correction procedure. 16 Compared to other developed cities in China like Shanghai (29%), Guangzhou (16.77%), and Tianjin (5.57%), [17][18][19] as well as developed country like Germany (12.0%) and France (6.2%), 20,21 the present results suggest that the detection rate of CRC high-risk in permanent residents of Shenzhen was relatively high, and the prevention of CRC is facing great challenges, and it was also of great significance for improving the health literacy level. The risk variables derived from the IPTW included six well-known modifiable factors (smoking and drinking status, obesity, red and processed meat) that were excluded in the present CRC screening methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%