Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Inter-Networking 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2030698.2030717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-world evaluation of IEEE 802.11p for vehicular networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For such communicating pairs, multiple interaction reflections and scattering are the dominant contributors of power at the receiver [30]; calculating such rays incurs prohibitively high computations and a geographical database with a high level of detail. Furthermore, our measurement results and those reported in similar studies (e.g., [6], [24], [25]) show that communication range in NLOSb (i.e., building-obstructed) conditions using DSRC radios operating in the 5.9 GHz frequency band is limited to approximately 200 meters, even with the maximum transmit power allowed by the standard [41]. Thus, in order to avoid costly geometric computations which predominantly yield power levels below reception threshold, at the same time allowing for communication in deeply faded areas, we determine the received power as follows.…”
Section: E Practical Considerations For Different Link Types and Prosupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For such communicating pairs, multiple interaction reflections and scattering are the dominant contributors of power at the receiver [30]; calculating such rays incurs prohibitively high computations and a geographical database with a high level of detail. Furthermore, our measurement results and those reported in similar studies (e.g., [6], [24], [25]) show that communication range in NLOSb (i.e., building-obstructed) conditions using DSRC radios operating in the 5.9 GHz frequency band is limited to approximately 200 meters, even with the maximum transmit power allowed by the standard [41]. Thus, in order to avoid costly geometric computations which predominantly yield power levels below reception threshold, at the same time allowing for communication in deeply faded areas, we determine the received power as follows.…”
Section: E Practical Considerations For Different Link Types and Prosupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, we use the communication ranges specified in Table VI. These values are based on our own measurements, as well as results previously collected in [6], [7], [24], [25]. Note that r LOS was set to 1000 meters outside urban areas and 500 meters in urban areas, whereas we use the same values of r NLOSv and r NLOSb in all environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the great potential of VANETs, current researches are mainly based on simulations or in the development of routing protocols, reinforcing the need for practical experiments [17]. The explanation lies in the scarcity of vehicle communication devices and their high cost, besides the high complexity involved during real experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside the power, loss-rate, throughput, and delivery ratio measurements, they presented their methodology for conducting experiments with 'real-world' mobile ad hoc networks and discussed problems of beacon position-based routing due to radio fluctuations. Neves et al [NCMS11] developed a small-scale testbed for experimenting the IEEE 802.11p protocol [IEE10] in a real-world scenario. This testbed consisted on two on-board units (single computer), two wireless interfaces, two antennas, and a GPS.…”
Section: Real-world Testbedsmentioning
confidence: 99%