2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c05424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realization of a Graphene/PMMA Acoustic Capacitive Sensor Released by Silicon Dioxide Sacrificial Layer

Abstract: We report the realization of an acoustic capacitive microphone formed by graphene/poly­(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). It is the first time that the ultra-large graphene/PMMA membrane suspended fully over the cavity has been fabricated by releasing the silicon dioxide sacrificial layer underneath the membrane. The novelty in the fabrication method is that the silicon dioxide layer has been etched by hydrogen fluoride vapor from the back of the partly etched silicon substrate. Using the new process, the ultra-lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, it is equal to the product between the electrical sensitivity S e and the mechanical sensitivity S m 0 contribution by the equation For this reason, the respective mechanical compliances are indirectly calculated by using eq and eqs , as also described by Baglioni et al . where the input values S e (m V Pa –1 or dB), pretension (N/m), resonance frequency (Hz), the distance membrane–bottom electrode g 0 (m), and V b (V) are obtained from the reported works. ,,,, For most of the presented data (electrical read-out), the mechanical compliance is indirectly calculated from eq . Thus, Figure may show limitations in the comparison with the results obtained by optical read-out (this work).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Theoretically, it is equal to the product between the electrical sensitivity S e and the mechanical sensitivity S m 0 contribution by the equation For this reason, the respective mechanical compliances are indirectly calculated by using eq and eqs , as also described by Baglioni et al . where the input values S e (m V Pa –1 or dB), pretension (N/m), resonance frequency (Hz), the distance membrane–bottom electrode g 0 (m), and V b (V) are obtained from the reported works. ,,,, For most of the presented data (electrical read-out), the mechanical compliance is indirectly calculated from eq . Thus, Figure may show limitations in the comparison with the results obtained by optical read-out (this work).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of the mechanical compliance normalized by the area of graphene microphone. The extrapolated mechanical compliances related to the principal graphene microphone works, ,,,, and the proposed results are presented. The values are normalized by area of the suspended graphene to have an accurate correlation within the different works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21–25 In general, these works focused on fabricating a condenser microphone structure, involving either wet or dry transfer 20–22 of large graphene membranes (from 2 to 12 mm in diameter) over pre-patterned substrates or via dry etching of a sacrificial layer. 23 In these devices, the incoming sound is transduced to an electrical signal via the change in capacitance between a fixed backplate and the movable membrane. Although these works have demonstrated successful capacitive readout of audio signals with high output voltage per unit pressure, other important device performance parameters, like the mechanical sensitivity, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), total harmonic distortion (THD), bandwidth and dynamic range, have been less extensively characterized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%