2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.103.200503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Realization of Universal Ion-Trap Quantum Computation with Decoherence-Free Qubits

Abstract: Any residual coupling of a quantum computer to the environment results in computational errors. Encoding quantum information in a so-called decoherence-free subspace provides means to avoid these errors. Despite tremendous progress in employing this technique to extend memory storage times by orders of magnitude, computation within such subspaces has been scarce. Here, we demonstrate the realization of a universal set of quantum gates acting on decoherence-free ion qubits. We combine these gates to realize the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(10). Since the reparametrized time remains infinite in the limit T → ∞, optimality of our solution is not affected by changing the unit of time.…”
Section: B Recovery Of Stirapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(10). Since the reparametrized time remains infinite in the limit T → ∞, optimality of our solution is not affected by changing the unit of time.…”
Section: B Recovery Of Stirapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The condition for a dark state ensuring STIRAP turns out to be equivalent to the condition for a decoherence-free subspace to exist [9]. While in principle it is possible to construct quantum gates that preserve the structure of the decoherence free subspace [10], these gates are generally difficult to implement in practice for the following reason: the gate operations need to be carried out with controls that act on the physical qubits and this introduces couplings to the decohering subspaces [11]. This raises the question of whether losses can still be avoided if the controls are chosen in an optimal way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of quantum information, two or more physical qubits, carried for example by atoms, can be used to encode one logical qubit that is decoherence-free [120]. Decoherence-free subspaces have been demonstrated, for example, in liquid-state nuclear magnetic resonance [121] and with trapped ions [122]. Numerical methods can be employed to identify (approximate) decoherence-free subspaces [123] and to find an external control that drives the system dynamics into a decoherence-free subspace [124].…”
Section: B Control Strategies For Open Quantum Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6), provide additional flexibility in engineering the simulating Hamiltonian parameters. In contrast to the digital fashion of quantum simulation in decoherence free subspace [42], the present analog quantum simulation will save precious time in case of simu- …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%