2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3526292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reanalysis and Reclassification of Rare Genetic Variants Associated with Inherited Arrhythmogenic Syndromes

Abstract: A B S T R A C TBackground: Accurate interpretation of rare genetic variants is a challenge for clinical translation. Updates in recommendations for rare variant classification require the reanalysis and reclassification. We aim to perform an exhaustive re-analysis of rare variants associated with inherited arrhythmogenic syndromes, which were classified ten years ago, to determine whether their classification aligns with current standards and research findings. Methods: In 2010, the rare variants identified th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, 27% (59/218) of the pLoF variants were downgraded by our manual review of sequence reads. Together, these ClinVar, review, and pLoF variants that were downgraded by our curation (77/463, 17%) had markedly reduced effect sizes compared to variants we curated as clinically significant (Supplementary Data 4) [23][24][25][26] . These findings support our curation process and highlight the need for caution in relying on available variant designations without additional review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, 27% (59/218) of the pLoF variants were downgraded by our manual review of sequence reads. Together, these ClinVar, review, and pLoF variants that were downgraded by our curation (77/463, 17%) had markedly reduced effect sizes compared to variants we curated as clinically significant (Supplementary Data 4) [23][24][25][26] . These findings support our curation process and highlight the need for caution in relying on available variant designations without additional review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…25 Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore. 26 Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. 27 Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, 27% (59/218) of the pLoF variants were downgraded by our manual review of sequence reads. Together, these ClinVar, review, and pLoF variants which were downgraded by our curation (77/463, 17%) had marked reduced effect sizes compared to variants we curated as clinically significant (Supplementary Table 5) [24][25][26][27] . These findings support our curation process and highlight the need for caution in relying on available variant designations without additional review.…”
Section: Identification Of High Confidence Clinically Significant Varmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Continued relationship with periodic follow up with the family is recommended as variant reclassification may occur over the course of years as new information becomes available. In a recent study of reinterpretation of sequence variants in genes causing inherited arrhythmogenic syndromes, reanalysis lead to reclassification of 70% of variants classified 10 years prior (Campuzano et al, 2020). Many clinical laboratories offer periodic reclassification, which often requires an ordering clinician to request the reanalysis.…”
Section: Genetic Testing In Sadsmentioning
confidence: 99%