“…Many take advantage of the linear nature of the flexure equation for constant elastic thickness to superimpose analytical solutions of point loads (in the spatial domain) or sinusoidal loads (in the wavenumber domain) in order to produce the flexural response to an arbitrary load (Comer, 1983;Royden and Karner, 1984). Other models produce numerical solutions to the thin plate flexure equation by solving the local derivatives in plate displacement with numerical (mostly finite difference) methods (e.g., Bodine et al, 1981;van Wees et al, 1994;Stewart and Watts, 1997;Pelletier, 2004;Govers et al, 2009;Sacek et al, 2009;Wickert, 2012;Braun et al, 2013). Models in this latter category allow for variations in the elastic thickness of the plate, a factor of growing importance as variations in elastic thickness through space and time are increasingly recognized, measured, and computed (e.g., Watts and Zhong, 2000;Watts, 2001;Van der Lee, 2002;Flück, 2003;Pérez-Gussinyé and Watts, 2005;Tassara et al, 2007;Pérez-Gussinyé et al, 2007Tesauro et al, 2009;Kirby andSwain, 2009, 2011;Lowry and Pérez-Gussinyé, 2011;Tesauro et al, 2012bTesauro et al, , a, 2013Braun et al, 2013;Kirby, 2014).…”