1993
DOI: 10.1159/000110334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reappraisal of the Incidence Rate of Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophies on the Basis of Molecular Diagnosis

Abstract: The incidence rates of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies (X-linked recessive) in a given sample of the Italian population were recalculated using the results of DNA and dystrophin analysis. While the incidence rate of Duchenne muscular dystrophy remained unchanged, the new figure for the incidence of Becker muscular dystrophy (7.2 per 100,000 male live births) was much higher than previously reported, since molecular diagnosis revealed additional cryptic cases, but this incidence is still an underestima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DMD is an X-linked recessive, fatal disorder. It has been estimated that 1 in 3,500 to 5,000 boys suffers from DMD [7, 8], and that approximately three to six of every 100,000 live births are affected by BMD [9, 10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DMD is an X-linked recessive, fatal disorder. It has been estimated that 1 in 3,500 to 5,000 boys suffers from DMD [7, 8], and that approximately three to six of every 100,000 live births are affected by BMD [9, 10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 DMD is the most common form of muscular dystrophy in childhood, occurring in one in 3500 male births. 13 DMD is progressive, leading to loss of ambulation by 13 years. Although DMD can be inherited as an X linked condition, about one third of patients have de novo mutations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Additional DMD or BMD studies were less comparable to ours, as they provided estimates per total residents rather than those for male individuals only, or reported estimates among live male births. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] Prevalence differences identified between our study and previous studies may reflect the changes in diagnostic methods over the past quarter century; many studies 5,[8][9][10]12,16,19 predated current diagnostic methods, potentially leading to misclassification of muscular dystrophy type. Prevalence differences identified may also be due, in part, to the racial/ ethnic composition of our sample; specifically, our cases were mostly non-Hispanic white and had insufficient numbers of cases to examine estimates for some racial/ethnic groups (eg, Asian and Pacific Islander).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6 Additional DMD or BMD studies were less comparable to ours, as they provided estimates per total residents rather than those for male individuals only, or reported estimates among live male births. [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] Romitti et al …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%