2016
DOI: 10.1515/kantyb-2016-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reason in Kant and Hegel

Abstract: In this paper I want to compare and contrast Kant and Hegel on reason. While both emphasize the close connection between reason and its ends, motivations and needs, and denounce a futile understanding of reason as a formal, instrumental, or simply logical reasoning, they diverge on how to interpret reason’s restlessness, teleology and life. After a section illustrating some uncritical assumptions widespread among readings of Kant, I move to a treatment of their respective views on reason’s self-realization (th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferrarin (2015: 34–42) also acknowledges the tension between the organic and the constructive model – as well as between the respective metaphors. On this point see also Ferrarin (2016: 2–3).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ferrarin (2015: 34–42) also acknowledges the tension between the organic and the constructive model – as well as between the respective metaphors. On this point see also Ferrarin (2016: 2–3).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…3See Ferrarin 2016: 12: ‘method is the design and plan of the whole, the scientific form that guides the organization of cognitions’.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the ideas of Immanuel Kant, Karl Popper was able to develop a strongly cohesive system of thought, creating a systematic philosophy in the great tradition of the centrality of the subject. His primary concern would be to separate science from pseudoscience, upholding reason as an end in itself, an ethical duty of human beings to provide themselves with transcendental truth (Ferrarin, 2016). In this sense, critical rationalism can be seen as the rational action of seeking truth through argument and compromise; in the same sense, based on its premise that all knowledge is transient and falsifiable, critical rationalism enables a posture of openness to dialogue with different views (Popper, 1934(Popper, /2005Thomas, 2010).…”
Section: Literary Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of Kant's great legacies was the possibility of approaching cognition from an idealistic standpoint, strictly based on a priori knowledge, negative reason and the ability to revise knowledge. Sir Karl Raimund Popper (1902Popper ( -1994 was one of the great heirs of Kant's critical thinking, and his ideas originated the philosophy of critical rationalism as we know it today (Chiappin, 2008;Ferrarin, 2016). In the penultimate section of this article, we will explore critical rationalism as a democratic attitude, marked by intellectual autonomy and modesty, as well as a necessary research approach to contemporary organizational studies -whose corpus is characterized by the large-scale production of justificationist studies (Thomas, 2010).…”
Section: Kant's Influence On Popper: Critical Rationalism In Organization Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%