Reasons behind stymied public hospital governance reform in China

Abstract

BackgroundThe public hospital governance reform in China is pledged to improve the governance of public hospitals and deliver affordable and high-quality care. However, progress in public hospital reform has been slow. The reason is poorly understood.MethodsA research center affiliated with China National Health Commission has conducted 32 workshops to interview 124 public hospital administrators from 30 provincial-level administrative divisions and 105 various-level government officials from three provinces. About 80% of administrators and 78% officials actively participated the discussions. We used a descriptive theoretical approach to understand the relationships between the governance reform and characteristics of its stakeholders. We also analyzed stakeholder interests and their power to influence the reform.FindingsAbout 66% of hospital administrators, 72% of health officials, and less than 10% of other officials support a new hospital governing structure. Local leadership, hospital administrators, and health commission said that administrators should have more power over the management of public hospitals. Other government departments and healthcare professionals had reservations on the governance reform. The reform of public hospital governance faces significant obstacles. The interests of most government stakeholders are not aligned with public interests. All stakeholders perceived that their workload would increase in the short term because of the governance reform of public hospitals. Most people involved in the reform are not incentivized to collaborate. The health commission has limited financial resources and insufficient political power to implement a massive reform. Most importantly, the public hospital reform is not, and likely will not be, a top policy priority to the central government or local leaderships.InterpretationThe health commission needs more political support and resources to speed up the public hospital reform. To fulfill the pledge of affordable, equitable access to quality care, Chinese government needs to overcome significant obstacles in the public hospital reform.

Developing senior hospital managers: does ‘one size fit all’? – evidence from the evolving Chinese Health System

“…The studies confirmed that less than 7% of hospital managers possessed management related qualifications or receiving extensive management training [22]. These studies reinforce the urgent need to improve management efficiency in Chinese public hospitals by strengthening the management competence of hospital managers in the areas of leadership and decision-making [24].…”

Developing senior hospital managers: does ‘one size fit all’? – evidence from the evolving Chinese health system

“…A brief search of literature from year 2000 onwards has found only15 studies focussing on the management capacity and competency of managers in Chinese public hospitals [23]. The studies confirmed that less than 7% of hospital managers possessed management related qualifications or receiving extensive management training [22]. These studies reinforce the urgent need to improve management efficiency in Chinese public hospitals by strengthening the management competence of hospital managers in the areas of leadership and decision-making [24].…”

“…Firstly, there are no agreed management standards and requirements currently used to guide hospital managers recruitment other than seniority and clinical performance [21]. Hence, the absence of a management track record [22] and the lack of specific management training among managers prior to taking up management positions is common in public hospitals in China [21]. Secondly, most postgraduate training is non-management and research focused rather than coursework-based / practice-based unlike many Master of Health Administration coursework programs offered by universities in developed countries.…”

Patient-provider relationships in China: A qualitative study on the perspectives of healthcare students and junior professionals

“…However, patient-provider relationships in China appeared to deteriorate after economic and healthcare reforms in the 1980s [ 3 , 13 , 14 ]. The current healthcare system faces challenges in delivering affordable and quality care with an acceptable bedside manner [ 15 , 16 ]. Ironically, the public-hospital-centered health system is mostly profit-driven [ 15 ].…”