2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.c28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reattachment of a Dehydrated Tooth Fragment Using Retentive Holes

Abstract: Coronal fracture of the anterior teeth is mainly common among children and adolescents. Though diverse treatment modalities are available, tooth fragment reattachment is generally considered a viable treatment option due to simplicity, natural aesthetics, and functional success. This paper presents a case of a 10.5-year-old female patient with a fractured maxillary central incisor with a dehydrated fragment. The dehydrated fragmented part was reattached with the help of retentive holes using an adhesive bondin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although conservative and fast, tooth fragment bonding is a conservative and fast approach that naturally reestablish the form, contour, and surface texture of a tooth without selecting material and shades by the DC (Farik et al, 2002;Taguchi et al, 2015;AlQhtani, 2020). However, the tooth fragment was not available for bonding, which excluded that treatment option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although conservative and fast, tooth fragment bonding is a conservative and fast approach that naturally reestablish the form, contour, and surface texture of a tooth without selecting material and shades by the DC (Farik et al, 2002;Taguchi et al, 2015;AlQhtani, 2020). However, the tooth fragment was not available for bonding, which excluded that treatment option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The great variety of restorative materials leads to divergences in clinical protocols among dental clinicians (DC). Although the materials' composition allowed the manufacturers to guide the clinical indications, their selection and clinical behavior depend on the clinical skills of DC (Demarco et al, 2012(Demarco et al, , 2017Laske et al, 2019;AlQhtani, 2020), cavity extension (Demarco et al, 2012;Borgia et al, 2019;AlQhtani, 2020), clinical time (Pini et al, 2012;Romero et al, 2017;Yanikian et al, 2019), esthetic demand (Demarco et al, 2012, tooth position in the arch (Demarco et al, 2012;Borgia et al, 2019;Laske et al, 2019), occlusal factors (Demarco et al, 2017), oral hygiene habits (Demarco et al, 2012;Borgia et al, 2019;Laske et al, 2019), risk of caries (Demarco et al, 2012(Demarco et al, , 2017Laske et al, 2019) and socioeconomical factors (Demarco et al, 2012(Demarco et al, , 2017. All these mentioned factors affect the longevity of restorations and must be taken into account during the treatment planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a well-hydrated intact tooth fragment is available, which fits to the remaining crown without interfering with the patient’s occlusion, the first-choice treatment should be adhesive reattachment of the fragment. It does not always have to be stored in a humid environment; a study shows that a dehydrated fragment was attached to the tooth with the use of additional retention elements, and after a 15 month follow-up, the tooth retained its vitality, functionality, and natural aesthetics [ 56 ]. However, the dehydration of the broken fragment may cause color disharmony with the tooth remnant, but such an issue disappears after about 12 months, due to the absorption of water by the fragment [ 57 , 58 ].…”
Section: Presentation Of Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%