2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-021-00793-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rebound in China’s coastal wetlands following conservation and restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the huge differences are unlikely to be attributed to the tidal flat evolution. Especially, evidence shows that there is rebound in China's coastal wetland following restoration and conservation [70], which is contrary to the situation that Murray_TF (circa 2015) is generally much larger than our result (circa 2021). The generally larger tidal flat extent of Murray_TF has been studied in previous studies.…”
Section: Comparisions With Other Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, the huge differences are unlikely to be attributed to the tidal flat evolution. Especially, evidence shows that there is rebound in China's coastal wetland following restoration and conservation [70], which is contrary to the situation that Murray_TF (circa 2015) is generally much larger than our result (circa 2021). The generally larger tidal flat extent of Murray_TF has been studied in previous studies.…”
Section: Comparisions With Other Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…3B). In China, there was also a large net reduction of tidal flat extent of >1000 km 2 largely due to reclamation ( 24 ) but net gains of tidal marshes (+ 200 km 2 ) that coincided with the rapid expansion of Spartina alterniflora across the country’s intertidal zone (Fig. 3C) (25), thus reducing China’s net tidal wetland loss to 800 km 2 (table S3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our empirical study was conducted in the wetlands in the north of Bohai Bay, between 38°36′-39°13′N and 117°11′-118.22′E, located in the northwest of the Yellow Sea (Figure S3). Despite habitat being lost in the surveyed area, the loss of favoured habitat was minimal, with the highest food density for migratory waterbirds compared to other staging sites in the Northern Yellow Sea (Peng et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2016). Our surveyed area is most equivalent to the S1 site in our IBMs.…”
Section: Empirical Datamentioning
confidence: 93%