2020
DOI: 10.1113/jp279426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rebuttal from Jean‐Paul Richalet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia are equivalent and then interchangeable has been an intense source of scientific debate, particularly with regards to their impact on exercise performance and various physiological parameters. Systematic reviews and “points-counterpoints” discussions have however, not enable researchers to reach any consensus ( Girard et al, 2012 ; Millet et al, 2012a , b , 2013 ; Mounier and Brugniaux, 2012a , b ; Faiss et al, 2013 ; Debevec and Millet, 2014 ; Richard et al, 2014 ; Coppel et al, 2015 ; DiPasquale et al, 2016 ; Richalet, 2020a , b ). Discrepancy between studies can be attributable to many cofounding factors: Different degrees of hypoxia, themselves determined either by barometric pressure, inspired PO 2 , oxygen fraction; seasonal and geographical differences in barometric pressure; air temperature and humidity; additional environmental stressors such as cold exposure; duration of exposure; presence or not of exercise interventions, and if so different exercise protocols; characteristics of subjects; animal versus human studies.…”
Section: Skeletal Muscle Angio-adaptive Responses To Hypoxia: Do Normobaric and Hypobaric Conditions Differ?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia are equivalent and then interchangeable has been an intense source of scientific debate, particularly with regards to their impact on exercise performance and various physiological parameters. Systematic reviews and “points-counterpoints” discussions have however, not enable researchers to reach any consensus ( Girard et al, 2012 ; Millet et al, 2012a , b , 2013 ; Mounier and Brugniaux, 2012a , b ; Faiss et al, 2013 ; Debevec and Millet, 2014 ; Richard et al, 2014 ; Coppel et al, 2015 ; DiPasquale et al, 2016 ; Richalet, 2020a , b ). Discrepancy between studies can be attributable to many cofounding factors: Different degrees of hypoxia, themselves determined either by barometric pressure, inspired PO 2 , oxygen fraction; seasonal and geographical differences in barometric pressure; air temperature and humidity; additional environmental stressors such as cold exposure; duration of exposure; presence or not of exercise interventions, and if so different exercise protocols; characteristics of subjects; animal versus human studies.…”
Section: Skeletal Muscle Angio-adaptive Responses To Hypoxia: Do Normobaric and Hypobaric Conditions Differ?mentioning
confidence: 99%