2021
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09012-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recasting direct detection limits within micrOMEGAs and implication for non-standard dark matter scenarios

Abstract: Direct detection experiments obtain 90% upper limits on the elastic scattering cross sections of dark matter with nucleons assuming point-like interactions and standard astrophysical and cosmological parameters. In this paper we provide a recasting of the limits from XENON1T, PICO-60, CRESST-III and DarkSide-50 and include them in micrOMEGAs. The code can then be used to directly impose constraints from these experiments on generic dark matter models under different assumptions about the DM velocity distributi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
81
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For consistency, we here calculated the darkmatter related variables using micrOMEGAs_5.0.4 [89]. Note that for some points, relic density values change using the most up-to-date version, that is, micrOMEGAs_5.2.4 [90].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For consistency, we here calculated the darkmatter related variables using micrOMEGAs_5.0.4 [89]. Note that for some points, relic density values change using the most up-to-date version, that is, micrOMEGAs_5.2.4 [90].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Micromegas [84][85][86] to calculate the relic density of the lightest neutralino DM and to include direct detection constraints from PICO-60 [87] and Xenon1T [88]. When comparing the DM relic density to the Planck data [51], we assume 10% theoretical uncertainty.…”
Section: Jhep05(2021)252mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…within micrOMEGAs [58] for a fixed DM mass and compare it against the effective SI cross section in eq. (3.35).…”
Section: Jhep06(2021)136mentioning
confidence: 99%