1992
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.158.2.1729805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Razavi et al, however, there are no significant differences in the detection of pneumothorax between 2K hard-copy and 2K soft-copy images of children's chest radiographs [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to Razavi et al, however, there are no significant differences in the detection of pneumothorax between 2K hard-copy and 2K soft-copy images of children's chest radiographs [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Objective observations of significance in the ICU setting were chosen for analysis. Previous comparison studies of CR have been based on receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves [5,6,9]. In the present study, the kappa statistic [8] was chosen over ROC curves because of the larger number of parameters being analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the kappa statistic [8] was chosen over ROC curves because of the larger number of parameters being analyzed. In a ROC study of 239 images selected to depict various chest abnormalities in children [5], the detection of pneumothorax, linear atelectasis, air bronchograms, and interstitial disease were compared on high-resolution soft-copy and laser-printed hard-copy images. No significant difference was found in the detection of pneumothorax and air bronchograms, while interstitial disease and linear atelectasis were slightly better seen with soft copy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable number of studies [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] have been conducted to determine whether or not a CRT display monitor was an acceptable alternative to the traditional light box-viewing method of film images. Although a CRT monitor with an appropriate display performance (such as resolution, luminance range, gray scale, contrast, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%