2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Advances in GC×GC and Chemometrics to Address Emerging Challenges in Nontargeted Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flavor profiles of the four e-liquids were characterized using nontargeted chemical analysis by two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOFMS), which can be applied in nontargeted analyses to identify a wide variety of compounds of interest. For each e-liquid, triplicate dilutions were prepared by first adding to a glass vial (for each dilution) 10 μL of the e-liquid and determining the precise mass (±0.0001 g) of the e-liquid. The next step was to dilute the e-liquid into 2 mL of isopropyl alcohol that contained 200 ng/mL of the internal standard (IS) acenaphthene- d 10 (and the other five isotopically labeled internal standards in the same mixture, as listed above).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flavor profiles of the four e-liquids were characterized using nontargeted chemical analysis by two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC-TOFMS), which can be applied in nontargeted analyses to identify a wide variety of compounds of interest. For each e-liquid, triplicate dilutions were prepared by first adding to a glass vial (for each dilution) 10 μL of the e-liquid and determining the precise mass (±0.0001 g) of the e-liquid. The next step was to dilute the e-liquid into 2 mL of isopropyl alcohol that contained 200 ng/mL of the internal standard (IS) acenaphthene- d 10 (and the other five isotopically labeled internal standards in the same mixture, as listed above).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cluster window size of 4 modulations (10 s) × 300 ms was used for the redundant hit removal step. 1,8 For both data processing methods, i.e., tilebased RF and tile-based F-ratio, a signal-to-noise (S/N) threshold of 10 was set to exclude tiles with poor chromatographic signals. Additionally, only tiles with at least 3 m/z above the S/N threshold are accounted for in the analyses.…”
Section: ■ Principles and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An importance score is then computed for every tile hit in every grid on a per-mass channel basis. Similar to the FRA, the redundant hits arising from the multigrid sampling are removed using the “pinning and clustering” algorithm. , …”
Section: Principles and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be evaluated through the identification of compounds for which particular factors of interest have a significant effect. Various statistical techniques, such as compound variability assessments (e.g., Fisher ratio filtering, t -tests, partial least squares) or unsupervised screening techniques (e.g., principal component analysis (PCA)), are generally employed as dimensionality reduction tools that aid in the identification of significant compounds prior to further multivariate analysis. Compound reduction can be complex for biological samples as the number of corresponding explanatory variables, which may impact compound presence or relative abundance, are increased with the expansion of the dataset . Furthermore, many explanatory biological variables with differing intralevel variabilities innately exist within biological datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%