Presented work studies the relation between kinetics of metal deposition via surface limited redox replacement (SLRR) of underpotentially deposited (UPD) monolayer (ML) and experimental parameters of reaction solution such as meal ions concentrations and supporting electrolyte concentration. The model system is Au deposition on Au(111) via SLRR of Pb UPD ML. The rate constant of the SLRR reaction for different solution designs is determined from temporal change of electrode surface reflectivity and from the open circuit potential transients' analysis. The obtained results show clearly that reaction kinetics of metal deposition via SLRR of UPD ML is significantly affected by the design of the reaction solution i.e. the UPD metal ion, depositing metal ion, and supporting electrolyte concentrations. The ten-fold change of concentration of either solution parameter produces approximately the same change in the value of the rate constants. The presented results have fundamental importance for the future development and application of the metal deposition via SLRR of UPD ML. They offer a link between the reaction solution design and expected trend in SLRR reaction rate, which transposes to successful control of deposition flux, nucleation density and resulting morphology of the deposit.
Deposition via Surface Limited Redox Replacement (SLRR) of underpotentially deposited (UPD) monolayer (ML)1 has gained a lot of attention and applications in last two decades.2-4 The main idea is to use an UPD ML as sacrificial material to reduce/deposit a more noble metal (SLRR reaction i.e. galvanic displacement). The basic stoichiometry of the SLRR reaction and deposition process is shown by Equation 1.Here, M and P and S(h,k,l) stand for UPD metal/ion, depositing metal/ion and substrate, while m + /m and p + /p represent the oxidation state of M and P metal ions and corresponding stoichiometry coefficients. Over the years, several experimental protocols for deposition via SLRR of UPD ML have been developed. The first and the basic one, 1,6 involves formation of the UPD ML of M on the substrate S(h,k,l), (potential controlled step) and then subsequent immersion of M UPD /S(h,k,l) into a separate reaction solution where SLRR occurs and deposition of P takes place at open circuit (sample shuffling approach). The second protocol involves the stagnant substrate but sequential application of potential control in solution for UPD ML formation and then application of solution for SLRR reaction and deposition of P at open circuit (solution shuffling approach 7 ). The most recent development has introduced a "one-solution, one-cell" experimental design. 8,9 In this case, the same solution serves for UPD ML formation and subsequent SLRR reaction at open circuit potential. This protocol assumes a sequence of potential controlled step, where co-deposition of UPD ML of M with small amount of P occurs, and the open circuit step, where SLRR reaction and deposition of P proceeds. The very details of these three protocols and their applications hav...