2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2011.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent deformation of Quaternary sediments as inferred from GPR images and shallow P-wave velocity tomograms: Northwest Canterbury Plains, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al (2015) illustrated that GPR is capable of detecting stratigraphic units in the Yushu area which has an extreme natural environment [54]. Compared with the single frequency GPR survey on the Yushu strike-slip fault or other strike-slip faults around the world [54,[76][77][78], a multi-frequency GPR profile has the great advantage of imaging the detailed shallow geometry of active faults at different depths and spatial resolutions to improve the interpreted results. The 25 MHz GPR profile has a much better quality than other frequency GPR data in the Yushu area.…”
Section: Muti-frequency Gpr Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al (2015) illustrated that GPR is capable of detecting stratigraphic units in the Yushu area which has an extreme natural environment [54]. Compared with the single frequency GPR survey on the Yushu strike-slip fault or other strike-slip faults around the world [54,[76][77][78], a multi-frequency GPR profile has the great advantage of imaging the detailed shallow geometry of active faults at different depths and spatial resolutions to improve the interpreted results. The 25 MHz GPR profile has a much better quality than other frequency GPR data in the Yushu area.…”
Section: Muti-frequency Gpr Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, urban buildings and hardened ground will seriously affect the layout of surveying lines, and uneven site conditions caused by ground excavation will reduce the data quality. At present, the geophysical prospecting methods of urban buried active faults include seismic method [8][9][10], electromagnetic method [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], resistivity [18][19][20][21][22], magnetic method [23][24][25], and gravity method [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4] Paleoseismological studies based on onshore surface mapping, examination of trenches and borehole cores, and age dating of representative samples have provided estimates of fault offset and timing in New Zealand, but usually only for the upper few meters of the Earth that have been affected by late Holocene deformation [Beanland et al, 1989;Berryman et al, 1992Berryman et al, , 1998Van Dissen and Berryman, 1996;Yetton 1998Yetton , 2002Langridge and Berryman, 2005;Villamor and Berryman, 2001, 2006a, 2006bVillamor et al, 2007;Langridge et al, 2010Langridge et al, , 2012. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) investigations have supplied additional details on fault geometry to greater depths of~20 m and earlier periods in the Holocene [Yetton and Nobes, 1998;Gross et al, 2004;McClymont et al, 2008aMcClymont et al, , 2008bMcClymont et al, , 2009aMcClymont et al, , 2009bMcClymont et al, , 2010Tronicke et al, 2006;Wallace et al, 2010;Carpentier et al, 2010Carpentier et al, , 2011Carpentier et al, , 2012. To provide fault geometry information deeper in the Earth and farther back in time, highresolution seismic reflection methods have been employed both onshore [Ghisetti et al, 2007;Kaiser et al, 2009Kaiser et al, , 2011Campbell et al, 2010aCampbell et al, , 2010bDorn et al, 2010aDorn et al, , 2010b and offshore [Taylor et al, 2004;Bull et al, 2006;Lamarche et al, 2006].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%