1995
DOI: 10.1038/375050a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent deformations of the deep continental root beneath southern Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
64
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
9
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because olivine is anisotropic and develops strain-induced lattice-preferred orientation, splitting results may be used to infer mantle strain fields [see review by Savage, 1998]. However, there is an ongoing dispute over whether •p at continental cratons is parallel to past geologic features and reflects the fossil lattice-preferred orientation (LPO) of olivine minerals within the Precambrian continental lithosphere [Silver and Chan, 1991;Silver, 1996], or if •p is directed parallel to the present-day absolute plate motion and reflects LPO associated with asthenospheric shear [Vinnik et al, 1992[Vinnik et al, , 1995. Silver [1996] presents an extensive compilation of the continental splitting results, showing that several continental shields (the Canadian Shield, Brazilian Craton, and Kaapval Craton) display •p parallel to ancient geologic structures, consistent with anisotropy caused by vertically coherent deformation of the crust and mantle during Precambrian orogenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because olivine is anisotropic and develops strain-induced lattice-preferred orientation, splitting results may be used to infer mantle strain fields [see review by Savage, 1998]. However, there is an ongoing dispute over whether •p at continental cratons is parallel to past geologic features and reflects the fossil lattice-preferred orientation (LPO) of olivine minerals within the Precambrian continental lithosphere [Silver and Chan, 1991;Silver, 1996], or if •p is directed parallel to the present-day absolute plate motion and reflects LPO associated with asthenospheric shear [Vinnik et al, 1992[Vinnik et al, , 1995. Silver [1996] presents an extensive compilation of the continental splitting results, showing that several continental shields (the Canadian Shield, Brazilian Craton, and Kaapval Craton) display •p parallel to ancient geologic structures, consistent with anisotropy caused by vertically coherent deformation of the crust and mantle during Precambrian orogenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They attributed this anisotropy to fossil deformation in the mantle lithosphere. Vinnik et al (1995) attributed the same NNE-SSW fast polarization directions to asthenospheric deformation in response to African plate motion. Significant variations of SKS delay times were measured near Kimberley, which was interpreted as the boundary between a strongly and a weakly anisotropic domain (Fouch et al, 2004b).…”
Section: Baptiste and A Tommasi: Seismic Properties Of The Kaapvamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation of the Kaapvaal craton has also been extensively investigated by seismic anisotropy studies (Silver et al, 2001;Fouch et al, 2004a;Fouch et al, 2004b;Silver et al, 2004;Adam and Lebedev, 2012;Vinnik et al, 1995Vinnik et al, , 2012. Silver et al (2001) measured fast polarization directions that consistently followed the trend of geological structures and small SKS delay times (0.62 s on average), with almost null delays in the central Kaapvaal craton.…”
Section: Baptiste and A Tommasi: Seismic Properties Of The Kaapvamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9a, b). The APM directions are consistent with the present ongoing asthenospheric flow (Vinnik et al, 1992(Vinnik et al, , 1995Vinnik and Montagner, 1996). By using different plots of the plate motion (APM of Eurasian and Indian plates referenced to the no-net-rotation (NNR) frame or the relative plate motion of the Indian Plate referenced to the Eurasian Plate), we want to examine the contribution of APM to explaining the observed anisotropic variation and to check which plate motion best explains the observed φ s of the splitting measurements.…”
Section: Deformation Pattern Revealed From the Comparison Of The Gpsmentioning
confidence: 99%