2021
DOI: 10.1080/03602532.2021.1922435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent developments inin vitroandin vivomodels for improved translation of preclinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 261 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of bupropion (CYP2B6 activity), abiotic degradation of the compound was observed, especially in the HL-ICOs. Determining the real in vitro dose facilitates reliable extrapolation of in vitro data towards in silico models [ 18 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of bupropion (CYP2B6 activity), abiotic degradation of the compound was observed, especially in the HL-ICOs. Determining the real in vitro dose facilitates reliable extrapolation of in vitro data towards in silico models [ 18 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, the development of non-animal alternatives evolved to generate human-based toxicity data as well as to replace, reduce and refine animal use (3Rs) in safety evaluations [ 16 , 17 ]. To perform reliable human-based toxicity screens or mechanistic studies into DILI pathways, hepatic human in vitro models need to express morphological and functional features, such as drug metabolism, similar to an in vivo situation [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would allow comparison and potential extrapolation of experimental outcomes from different models [55]. Established biomarkers could facilitate in these comparisons [54,56,57]. For bone regeneration, commonly assessed biomarkers include e.g., alkaline phosphatase, RUNX2, bone morphogenetic protein 2 and 7, osteopontin, osteocalcin, collagen type I, and vascular markers VEGF and CD31 [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would allow comparison and potential extrapolation of experimental outcomes from different models [51]. Established biomarkers could facilitate in these comparisons [50,52,53]. For bone regeneration, commonly assessed biomarkers include e.g ., alkaline phosphatase, RUNX2, bone morphogenetic protein 2 and 7, osteopontin, osteocalcin, collagen type I, and vascular markers VEGF and CD31 [54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%