An in vitro observation of time-dependent-inhibition of metabolic enzymes often results in removing a potential drug from the drug-pipeline. However, the accepted method for predicting TDIs of the important drug metabolizing cytochrome P450 enzymes often overestimates the drug interaction potential. Better models that take into account the complexities of the cytochrome P450 enzyme system will lead to better predictions. Herein we report the use of our previously described models for complex kinetics of podophyllotoxin. Spectral characterization of the kinetics indicates that an intermediate MI-complex is formed, which slowly progresses to an essentially irreversible MI-complex. The intermediate MI-complex can release free enzyme during the time-course of a typical 30 minute TDI experiment. This slow rate of MI-complex conversion results in an over-prediction of the kinact value if this process is not included in the analysis of the activity versus time profile. In vitro kinetic experiments in rat liver microsomes predicted a lack of drug interaction between podophyllotoxin and midazolam. In vivo rat pharmacokinetic studies confirmed this lack of drug interaction.
Time-dependent inactivation (TDI) of cytochrome P450s (CYPs) is a leading cause of clinical drug–drug interactions (DDIs). Current methods tend to overpredict DDIs. In this study, a numerical approach was used to model complex CYP3A TDI in human-liver microsomes. The inhibitors evaluated included troleandomycin (TAO), erythromycin (ERY), verapamil (VER), and diltiazem (DTZ) along with the primary metabolites N-demethyl erythromycin (NDE), norverapamil (NV), and N-desmethyl diltiazem (NDD). The complexities incorporated into the models included multiple-binding kinetics, quasi-irreversible inactivation, sequential metabolism, inhibitor depletion, and membrane partitioning. The resulting inactivation parameters were incorporated into static in vitro–in vivo correlation (IVIVC) models to predict clinical DDIs. For 77 clinically observed DDIs, with a hepatic-CYP3A-synthesis-rate constant of 0.000 146 min−1, the average fold difference between the observed and predicted DDIs was 3.17 for the standard replot method and 1.45 for the numerical method. Similar results were obtained using a synthesis-rate constant of 0.000 32 min−1. These results suggest that numerical methods can successfully model complex in vitro TDI kinetics and that the resulting DDI predictions are more accurate than those obtained with the standard replot approach.
Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme kinetics often do not conform to Michaelis-Menten assumptions, and time-dependent inactivation (TDI) of CYPs displays complexities such as multiple substrate binding, partial inactivation, quasi-irreversible inactivation, and sequential metabolism. Additionally, in vitro experimental issues such as lipid partitioning, enzyme concentrations, and inactivator depletion can further complicate the parameterization of in vitro TDI. The traditional replot method used to analyze in vitro TDI datasets is unable to handle complexities in CYP kinetics, and numerical approaches using ordinary differential equations of the kinetic schemes offer several advantages. Improvement in the parameterization of CYP in vitro kinetics has the potential to improve prediction of clinical drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This manuscript discusses various complexities in TDI kinetics of CYPs, and numerical approaches to model these complexities. The extrapolation of CYP in vitro TDI parameters to predict in vivo DDIs with static and dynamic modeling is discussed, along with a discussion on current gaps in knowledge and future directions to improve the prediction of DDI with in vitro data for CYP catalyzed drug metabolism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.