2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent progress in the direct ethanol fuel cell: development of new platinum–tin electrocatalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
398
2
23

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 634 publications
(449 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
8
398
2
23
Order By: Relevance
“…9a and b showing polarization curves recorded after the durability test normalized to the MEA surface area and platinum loading, respectively. The maximum power density of commercial Pt 83 Sn 17 33 /C showed a maximum power density loss of 52, 64 and 67%, respectively. At this stage, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions around this behavior because more post-durability investigations are needed regarding the catalyst composition, reaction products analysis, MEA diagnostics and more.…”
Section: Defc Durability Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…9a and b showing polarization curves recorded after the durability test normalized to the MEA surface area and platinum loading, respectively. The maximum power density of commercial Pt 83 Sn 17 33 /C showed a maximum power density loss of 52, 64 and 67%, respectively. At this stage, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions around this behavior because more post-durability investigations are needed regarding the catalyst composition, reaction products analysis, MEA diagnostics and more.…”
Section: Defc Durability Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the performance results of PtSnRu/C [13][14][15] could be explained mainly by the difference in the methods employed for the preparation of the catalysts. For example, with binary catalysts, Lamy's group obtained the optimum performance with Pt:Sn (9:1) using methods such as co-impregnation-reduction [16] and the Bönneman method [17]. Conversely, Xin's group found that optimum performances were obtained with higher Sn content (PtSn (2:1) to PtSn (1:1)) using a modified-polyol method [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is more attractive and appears to fulfill most of the requirements of the fuel for lowtemperature fuel cells. Thus, besides DMFC, direct ethanol fuel cell (DEFC) is another promising low-temperature fuel cell [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalyst characterizations using NMR, Raman, FT-IR/ATR-IR, TEM/SEM, XRD, neutron scattering, soft-x ray XPS, etc. have extensively been studied [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], but they are difficult to observe the dynamic and spatial behavior and transformation of Pt nanoparticles under PEFC operating conditions. In situ time-resolved X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) techniques are very powerful for in situ/ operando investigation of the local coordination structures and oxidation states of supported nanoparticle catalysts under working conditions particularly in such complex systems as PEFCs, involving Pt valence change and Pt-O/ Pt-Pt bonds transformation [14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%