“…Nevertheless, the results for the 40 states reported in the first three columns of Tables are of satisfactory quality and compare well with the best available results; indeed, the largest error, 3 × 10 −5 E h , is for the first 3 P e state, with electronic configuration 2p2p. Better results can be achieved by extending the basis set to higher n ℓ functions, but, as already stated, our goal is not an optimal basis for a single state. The basis set orbital exponents are: 2p = 1.86, 1.142, 0.5, 0.16; 3p = 1.168, 0.7, 0.333333, 0.05; 4p = 0.65, 0.25, 0.025; 5p = 0.7, 0.2, 0.04; 6p = 0.166667; 3d = 1.15, 0.75, 0.333333, 0.078; 4d = 0.65, 0.25, 0.06; 5d = 0.8, 0.2, 0.05; 6d = 0.9, 0.166667, 0.04; 4f = 1.688, 1.53, 0.25, 0.08; 5d = 0.572, 0.3033, 0.2, 0.07; 6d = 0.93, 0.4, 0.166667, 0.06; 5g = 0.672, 0.365, 0.2, 0.05; 6g = 0.844, 0.406, 0.166667, 0.04; 6h = 2.18, 1.9, 1.0, 0.166667, 0.04.…”