2016
DOI: 10.1016/bs.aiq.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Progress in the Variational Orbital Approach to Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the same basis set must adequately represent 40 states, each one with even or odd parity and triplet or singlet multiplicity, some compromise must be accepted. Nevertheless, the results for the 40 states reported in the first three columns of Tables are of satisfactory quality and compare well with the best available results; indeed, the largest error, 3 × 10 −5 E h , is for the first 3 P e state, with electronic configuration 2p2p. Better results can be achieved by extending the basis set to higher n ℓ functions, but, as already stated, our goal is not an optimal basis for a single state.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the same basis set must adequately represent 40 states, each one with even or odd parity and triplet or singlet multiplicity, some compromise must be accepted. Nevertheless, the results for the 40 states reported in the first three columns of Tables are of satisfactory quality and compare well with the best available results; indeed, the largest error, 3 × 10 −5 E h , is for the first 3 P e state, with electronic configuration 2p2p. Better results can be achieved by extending the basis set to higher n ℓ functions, but, as already stated, our goal is not an optimal basis for a single state.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Nevertheless, the results for the 40 states reported in the first three columns of Tables are of satisfactory quality and compare well with the best available results; indeed, the largest error, 3 × 10 −5 E h , is for the first 3 P e state, with electronic configuration 2p2p. Better results can be achieved by extending the basis set to higher n ℓ functions, but, as already stated, our goal is not an optimal basis for a single state. The basis set orbital exponents are: 2p = 1.86, 1.142, 0.5, 0.16; 3p = 1.168, 0.7, 0.333333, 0.05; 4p = 0.65, 0.25, 0.025; 5p = 0.7, 0.2, 0.04; 6p = 0.166667; 3d = 1.15, 0.75, 0.333333, 0.078; 4d = 0.65, 0.25, 0.06; 5d = 0.8, 0.2, 0.05; 6d = 0.9, 0.166667, 0.04; 4f = 1.688, 1.53, 0.25, 0.08; 5d = 0.572, 0.3033, 0.2, 0.07; 6d = 0.93, 0.4, 0.166667, 0.06; 5g = 0.672, 0.365, 0.2, 0.05; 6g = 0.844, 0.406, 0.166667, 0.04; 6h = 2.18, 1.9, 1.0, 0.166667, 0.04.…”
Section: Computational Detailssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In a recent volume celebrating the 100 th anniversary of the birth of Per-Olov Löwdin, one of his students, Carlos F. Bunge, dedicated a chapter to him [15]. Another chapter about the state of the art in highly accurate CI calculations on atoms and molecules [16] is also recommended.…”
Section: Configuration Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This becomes important for very accurate CI calculations, as reported e.g. by Bunge [16]. In our work, we have constructed the configurations as linear combinations of all different terms occurring in the different degenerate configuration, see Table 1.…”
Section: Selection Of Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since FCI approach is associated with exponential computational scaling, much research has been focused on the development of less computationally demanding ab initio methods for strongly correlated molecular systems. Examples of such methods include: truncated (limited) CI methods and CI methods with various extrapolations [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74], multireference coupled cluster (CC) methods [75][76][77][78][79][80], iterative variational approaches [81][82][83][84][85][86], various methods based on density-matrices [87][88][89][90], matrix product states (MPS) and tensor product states (TPS)-based approaches [91][92][93][94][95] which include popular density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method [96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%