SAE Technical Paper Series 1997
DOI: 10.4271/972744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Results of Biodegradability and Toxicology Studies of Water-Glycol Hydraulic Fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the results of the experiment with the acute toxicity rating scale provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) revealed that p-TSA is categorized as a practically nontoxic compound to aquatic organisms, especially fish [ 50 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the results of the experiment with the acute toxicity rating scale provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) revealed that p-TSA is categorized as a practically nontoxic compound to aquatic organisms, especially fish [ 50 , 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to rapid progress in the development and use of water-based hydraulic fluids in recent years. Among these, water-glycol hydraulic fluid is widely used because it is highly non-flammable, environmentally friendly, and relatively inexpensive, and it has a low pour point and high stability [3,4]. However, its poor lubricating property and poor antirust and anticorrosion performances, due to its significant amount of water, have greatly hindered its practical applications in various fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have therefore been widely used as fire-resistant hydraulic fluids and metalworking fluids in industry. [1][2][3][4] However, most of the commonly available water-based lubricants, such as water-glycol hydraulic fluid, W/O (water in oil) emulsion, and synthetic cutting fluid, have poor extreme-pressure and anti-wear properties, which seriously limit their uses. [5][6][7][8] For example, in the processes of metal heavy cutting, like broaching and gear hobbing, water-based lubricants cannot be satisfactorily applied and mineral oils-based cutting fluids are still preferred because of their excellent lubricity, even though they create some severe problems, including misting, fire hazard and environment pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with petroleum oils, water‐based lubricants have certain advantages, such as incombustibility, excellent cooling ability, environmental compatibility and low cost. They have therefore been widely used as fire‐resistant hydraulic fluids and metalworking fluids in industry . However, most of the commonly available water‐based lubricants, such as water–glycol hydraulic fluid, W/O (water in oil) emulsion, and synthetic cutting fluid, have poor extreme‐pressure and anti‐wear properties, which seriously limit their uses .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%