2000
DOI: 10.5802/jedp.584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent results on Lieb-Thirring inequalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, inequality (1.1) is the Legendre transformation of an earlier result proved in [1], as it was pointed out in [10]. In the present article we show that the method developed in [7] can be used to establish the sharp upper bound for the moments of the Dirichlet eigenvalues λ 0 k of certain negative powers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…In fact, inequality (1.1) is the Legendre transformation of an earlier result proved in [1], as it was pointed out in [10]. In the present article we show that the method developed in [7] can be used to establish the sharp upper bound for the moments of the Dirichlet eigenvalues λ 0 k of certain negative powers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The motivation for this extension was the work of Laptev and Weidl [LW1] who realized that the extension allowed one to conclude that good/sharp constants obtained in low dimensions would automatically give good/sharp constants in higher dimensions. The fact that the inequality (1.1) is valid in the matrix case was proved by Hundertmark [H], confirming a conjecture in [LW2]. He follows Cwikel's method and obtains a constant which is far from optimal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Before stating our main results let us recall the standard Lieb-Thirring inequalities (see [5] and also the survey [4]). For real-valued potentials V one has the bound…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Here and in the sequel t − := max{0, −t} denotes the negative part of t.) By L γ,d we will always mean the sharp constant in (3) (which at present is only known for [4]). For general, complex-valued potentials we shall prove Theorem 1 (Eigenvalue sums).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%